Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1587555962.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> <20200424101153.GC456@infradead.org>
 <20200424232024.A39974C046@d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <CAOQ4uxgiome-BnHDvDC=vHfidf4Ru3jqzOki0Z_YUkinEeYCRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200425094350.GA11881@infradead.org> <CAOQ4uxg2KOVBxqF400KW3VaQEaX4JGqfb_vCW=esTMkJqZWwvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200427062810.GA12930@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200427062810.GA12930@infradead.org>
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:15:22 +0300
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxicztq5toBst2tEO4MfbrTPyhyP8KVwki36V9fZ=24RCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4/overlayfs: fiemap related fixes
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Murphy Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:28 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 01:49:43PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > I would use as generic helper name generic_fiemap_checks()
> > akin to generic_write_checks() and generic_remap_file_range_prep() =>
> > generic_remap_checks().
>
> None of the other fiemap helpers use the redundant generic_ prefix.

Fine. I still don't like the name _validate() so much because it implies
yes or no, not length truncating.

What's more, if we decide that FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC handling should
be done inside this generic helper, we would definitely need to rename it
again. So how about going for something a bit more abstract like
fiemap_prep() or whatever.

What is your take about FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC handling btw?

Thanks,
Amir.