Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp893839ybk; Sat, 9 May 2020 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKRKwNympxWgjAoi+zT/PtExJe43zjz4r03/A1btWYIZjEuZWf7K0dhr/v0AE3e5NWPtcNH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7743:: with SMTP id o3mr8644839ejn.120.1589091990715; Sat, 09 May 2020 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589091990; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k6Pt6H+eWIUR8/zsXYGHdGNMY7d2bBDEQcIR6yqN++eefQ5dcTfBghBV/js8JLa+Ly knlkhNN/dmJ+ubm85rd3QKKKyhyXg/9aEh1IVzFGTEFbDh9Dn5ym6XZ7XpG0VSrNEpCr mWw/thQNg3IaA62sBh6qMlrTiI7gvY/f42+ovnRe/0xguiRS72fNGV0KK3bEyAb4weSN fLwnz981gZyQgNG/my4tATFQEDjE2HldFERnwmLaL+6Uiok2o268ab+dbFKneLpl/6fZ Mxy/SoMKE00YoXpn++Gbj5+N/tcjhMZGE1QvGgZ03lpCpWvXyWC2e3ENj3gqxYtc90et fSJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=kMc6i6eXhjf+4V1Q7Pl87UYMVp1lTctRBr5veBfmgHA=; b=RgAff5UdDyJy8XoTyzRA4p5L/vyZeA6Fy0XJDSn0FJDzXJ30Tf2d8rj+hyYlr8Fzkn Gomzy3OAuyClRHD1P6K+4TV8xQ83rtubE+YHKsmR+jnCsxE4qhulnanzjr3JUxPnoj9I KiIK2fmW8ROVFnrzOd4sMf7oCl2DMrMgGAtwEjGSR0scBN3InXt5y7A41F5GKrCejXDj BHXvmVlcvqCnDBFvLW6gfcNBxTVDXnfrFwceUy5DWgfOnPFZpkC0wlMUfW8LuL8Xul6d xMr9wUAnx1kebecOCxtzxax6Ou+SYpyDuLhSlFOod0RYq7JI/P7MUr38yKw62vSYt+Kf Rd5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si4026522ejw.409.2020.05.09.23.26.08; Sat, 09 May 2020 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728146AbgEJGZt (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 10 May 2020 02:25:49 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52180 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727122AbgEJGZs (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2020 02:25:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04A639Ux043295; Sun, 10 May 2020 02:25:42 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30ws59bx06-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 May 2020 02:25:42 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04A6K7ef020359; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:40 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30wm558t4t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:40 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04A6Pc1d65798284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:38 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0427242042; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738AF42041; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.61.127]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 May 2020 06:25:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , tytso@mit.edu, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Ritesh Harjani Subject: [RFC 10/16] ext4: balloc: Use task_pid_nr() helper Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:54:50 +0530 Message-Id: <4b58403e15e9c8deb34a1b93deb3fc9cd153ab84.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-10_01:2020-05-08,2020-05-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=795 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005100055 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Use task_pid_nr() function instead of current->pid. There should be no functionality change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani --- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c index a32e5f7b5385..1ba46d87cdf1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -903,10 +903,11 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_inode_to_goal_block(struct inode *inode) return bg_start; if (bg_start + EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(inode->i_sb) <= last_block) - colour = (current->pid % 16) * + colour = (task_pid_nr(current) % 16) * (EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(inode->i_sb) / 16); else - colour = (current->pid % 16) * ((last_block - bg_start) / 16); + colour = (task_pid_nr(current) % 16) * + ((last_block - bg_start) / 16); return bg_start + colour; } -- 2.21.0