Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp3164374ybk; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzM811Me/Y/+5dxA3NpICy78q2UH3HF15IH8Hib+QDmrHY7DbgCm3wE6QryzBrfaKQXcj/l X-Received: by 2002:a50:ae02:: with SMTP id c2mr15722214edd.373.1589857909836; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589857909; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IvWnTjIdBgUE6ICm9MKB3bh5V0Z5Idzvdnjfsxhjn06EUGP7QvwScNPyl6+vSB2SID lv4RGGBafHuvg6PB8KBbvfth1r5xoZt9KIIgGp5iNP82Fv4edBCoeS5lI2xky/P6lBw8 33mAeo5SBiGNKeDZIDDkb6qiMO9F5TiY+cnYlF76hZgn6qWE1AOMSqATDhXg+BLnJAVv 0d2ST/mabgxHtmMaCuVr005w3SkpjnQRF7xjHxOC2WEG8cXdRHlYyIrKaCp2MQ1uB2R8 JRf2yCUjW8FXtzghsfQeEx6IU09BCf9AFz/eGEYhSNh6rwKi3YqDAAWl0pDKDSa7yb6M CMTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=HJhDzghaDus6f0rtvCI2Qsb4c84mmP58u6IsSrwW2iU=; b=U7C/p36/98l+Vf5xdsjKaZeYsg7mgF75rR4NTMm7a/6pQACjsU3A4cFdwJE8IbCa/P wF3ekFBlJpdjp7rh5W/RmAfYdjW+hHEirIQJgrEXz5eTl/1Vr6hcoPXtcnMDA/O4yV+G 7xat7c3AohWulMAWkprY6HmDPonSaDyNZwE1EVh68ArA08SophgfWE1e0NdboAJUxoNx uF6QbxmAIJgNkxKJyotPd8jAAthzMw4sjMO7dCNmzMMuG366ReQj5MikPvpHXaeaNF6F fjTHQmMTRb5UYCipjoIZzC6j8iEUTyvWRJyaPjHycnTnZezAt1y6IDC4xT3JLnKoO18A C5Mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=o+ynbEIx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt5si6235198ejc.335.2020.05.18.20.11.24; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=o+ynbEIx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726573AbgESDLS (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 May 2020 23:11:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37854 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726539AbgESDLS (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 23:11:18 -0400 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-107-3-166-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [107.3.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E91920758; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:11:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589857877; bh=fQJhv7BXMwaA0dzpsoMf8NxlxMhmUG7xRjrY2MXodxk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=o+ynbEIxoWC9ZFUzgGEI+UEkWw4JYgHAi8bBZyNyqyAeKmCWNf0hhlHYX3lYPpSgy i3TWO+cmOWGoANRs1YhK8eRfs/3kf1hx7r9vvLPWjY3O/xvqClBcBWuxB0siNrneQn uNR70h8mSFz04av7XzCEvSTAm2XfWYahSMAtSOYk= Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 20:11:15 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Daniel Rosenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2 Message-ID: <20200519031115.GC954@sol.localdomain> References: <20200512233251.118314-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20200512233251.118314-4-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20200519025355.GC2396055@mit.edu> <20200519030205.GB954@sol.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200519030205.GB954@sol.localdomain> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:02:05PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 04:32:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > From: Eric Biggers > > > > > > v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new > > > features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2. > > > > > > Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for > > > encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies. > > > > > > To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or > > > "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no > > > argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting > > > -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2. > > > > > > To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support > > > specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting > > > "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a > > > pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags. > > > > > > To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set > > > or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but > > > xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.) > > > > > > Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, > > > there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and > > > ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored > > > inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from > > > 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > > > > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o > > > > Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this? > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > > index 04bfaf63752c..6c9fc9e21c13 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c > > @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard); > > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(meta_bg_resize); > > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(encryption); > > +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(test_dummy_encryption_v2); > > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE > > EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(casefold); > > @@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { > > ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize), > > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > ATTR_LIST(encryption), > > + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2), > > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE > > ATTR_LIST(casefold), > > > > This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know > > whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 > > will work, and whether test_dummy_encryption tests v1 or v2. > > > > Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"? Jaegeuk, do you want /sys/fs/f2fs/features/test_dummy_encryption_v2 as well, to match what Ted wants for ext4? It would be the following change: diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c index e3bbbef9b4f09e4..3162f46b3c9bfc1 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c @@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ enum feat_id { FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM, FEAT_CASEFOLD, FEAT_COMPRESSION, + FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2, }; static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a, @@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a, case FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM: case FEAT_CASEFOLD: case FEAT_COMPRESSION: + case FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2: return sprintf(buf, "supported\n"); } return 0; @@ -563,6 +565,7 @@ F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(avg_vblocks); #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(encryption, FEAT_CRYPTO); +F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(test_dummy_encryption_v2, FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2); #endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(block_zoned, FEAT_BLKZONED); @@ -647,6 +650,7 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(f2fs); static struct attribute *f2fs_feat_attrs[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED ATTR_LIST(block_zoned),