Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp1982441ybk; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDcK+nMqhXT9fOlFjCpLDg42Uoyq9Px2fgKvAN8OpXtWsPCoUs/wB/S0w3oguZPkpO6J5F X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:22d9:: with SMTP id dm25mr1650741edb.380.1590123424987; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:57:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590123424; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HfRmCBu5hMER0/3Rv5WJhr21XovPFdaDrJvVoKbj87vBm0t+SincProsrEwB4Y2yN+ +LiIfWBbyW2EK7cpKTzHw5y4Wfn3yWmNZ4vyzZb+BYseG/tsnVHMANSKpsWu1dyM1rMO UD5X7tRhTNK+SeDTbGz1xGHzzMNLyVCjVplPyvO9Om0+KT1EGp/OAwjyiiDGK0gx5mvb MD3ZYo1ep0wBSTLNYvIadBiaWjTHSmkNJUAAkeLxyGDtt2WqPmoCbvxS4Inor8I8KEV5 OrZoI1zM6MfEFL99KW9oMpLW5grNJJNv4LxBdY3j9MKjHpQ/OyCJMblMeczM1F7ahd8N 83Kw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=HUbHfPNmTbu4ctyPCNklCkDL8Qa0yGq7Hose+vNxUdI=; b=sBrORpkyn90C4UQdzvujq7u85bL8Hv8r6k/HGq+rBlutRtkmU5cwgeX8rXmIpUYB8o ZVRvyV1tmyL/m2vCJDogKdRxXb1OVserxx/p9OD5xJk4QTMZd3dJSqyYPw9bnf9tfhVq 1UOrnsbMr942WppKy9vtXUa33nQk8shKwgESiZWpHEue8ggvNiGq5KlxIN45FJVQKft8 ngTWahmf3YI/a23byb66H6pXfrWERHsR+VuYpSYPDpDOZiaaywLMZS6UEqXLdqecHlgy dYX7vZMzmk1xVFk3nYD+nPqkRtRl8qxcK6JQ/o3jRir4ekaWnx4/MQwhL+aTMSV/WnUS IaPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HSwpbmpN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10si3975293edt.181.2020.05.21.21.56.42; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HSwpbmpN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726404AbgEVE4Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 May 2020 00:56:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726338AbgEVE4Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 00:56:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5650AC061A0E; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id k7so4380257pjs.5; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:56:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HUbHfPNmTbu4ctyPCNklCkDL8Qa0yGq7Hose+vNxUdI=; b=HSwpbmpN/NsMlf8GRobtYw4MbqLnCFOmBsW9Coz/cHTxIrITp0Sbk2T+YtZz/+MInO bUmzGD/8ya32drYpzuNGs7PHIkgAfF6iRsWlQZOstMlslCS/Hkq4M20H/3v40T+PS1WU Co01HEJHU/O8QfANYlmNo84IEYbyNfG0n+zBwIw+WVHkiMFpsKPhP3WjhGG3wod8jIcI 71For32tEZwABqW/Jby+5vAzMMq1T2X/KSb/azM+BZCgmG1WO8dFAS7RgcU46Tzj7U4R aV+4OdAIau35x5GD9gmNhm/P4aDR3MY3PLj7mUO1w/aT9jS0Hv0mbrRy9r/PvyeO2/WQ P+vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HUbHfPNmTbu4ctyPCNklCkDL8Qa0yGq7Hose+vNxUdI=; b=JVT+cZ5cq2nFkAjkPunr0Tkbm6aZIEEhiiP5UTPOvFKI/qJvx8stoejwXgA7XRMVDD HCd1sBa2FLQkLy6aDTaaQ84cU+De5+RMy1kRxHbnBpo274vKJSYDVyAK097jzlUs4WuB lmPRy9EKSLkL5VtuodK2TodjeMqD5MWru9r2q+SSE7ZZh92tHGGYKfWm+9mMk5cAa9Hm XKWBWwKv+BYbuG3arvnqjrPqoNpV737rYHHupwj9Wi/osOCuKD1ei1tf+rQtqB1pqbhH lajbiG0QDG5mTaA67oTX1eEXxfO4fZ/uX6ywIELkF/xGPtmrkHEqx1dqKBX5rjUQggRD ecJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533J66cbTv4OKwy9SN0iyC3iWZEIFVljk4Jxfx4cSJOd5J4W2d9G gQXhzsnuZVeW3TfP/08PCRW1hIgjIiQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b68d:: with SMTP id c13mr2589481pls.210.1590123383741; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fw4sm5668348pjb.31.2020.05.21.21.56.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 May 2020 21:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:56:15 +0800 From: Murphy Zhou To: Ritesh Harjani Cc: Murphy Zhou , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@dilger.ca, darrick.wong@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, Alexander Viro , Dan Carpenter , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Miklos Szeredi , Amir Goldstein , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4/overlayfs: fiemap related fixes Message-ID: <20200522045615.y3vhtfdbmpndzwvp@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20200519024311.7bkxi2fkxboon2ig@xzhoux.usersys.redhat.com> <20200521060833.855415204F@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200521060833.855415204F@d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hi Ritesh, On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:38:32AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Hello Murphy, > > On 5/19/20 8:13 AM, Murphy Zhou wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 04:17:52PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > Here are some changes, which as I understand, takes the right approach in fixing > > > the offset/length bounds check problem reported in threads [1]-[2]. > > > These warnings in iomap_apply/ext4 path are reported after ext4_fiemap() > > > was moved to use iomap framework and when overlayfs is mounted on top of ext4. > > > Though the issues were identified after ext4 moved to iomap framework, but > > > these changes tries to fix the problem which are anyways present in current code > > > irrespective of ext4 using iomap framework for fiemap or not. > > > > Ping? > > It's superseded by below mentioned patch series. > Please follow below thread. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20200520032837.GA2744481@mit.edu/T/#t Great. Thanks for the info! > > -ritesh -- Murphy