Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs, afs, ext4: Make the inode hash table RCU searchable
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
References: <8ac18259-ad47-5617-fa01-fba88349b82d@yandex-team.ru>
 <195849.1590075556@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <3735168.1590592854@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From:   Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-ID: <8c74f334-3711-ea07-9875-22f379a62bb3@yandex-team.ru>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 18:41:08 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3735168.1590592854@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 27/05/2020 18.20, David Howells wrote:
> Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> 
>>> Is this something that would be of interest to Ext4?
>>
>> For now, I've plugged this issue with try-lock in ext4 lazy time update.
>> This solution is much better.
> 
> Would I be able to turn that into some sort of review tag?

This version looks more like RFC, so

Acked-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>

this definitely will fix my problem with ext4 lazytime:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158040603451.1879.7954684107752709143.stgit@buzz/

> 
> David
>