Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1366607ybg; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgj2uaSHNZMTH9CLLsUJEoU896KkRPUyoSenYiaxzI4hit4cc0hoOZyALHh/uslkHEWWwS X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cdcb:: with SMTP id h11mr7373828edw.218.1591887851564; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591887851; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dtgS5IX8c7y3Ih459dqvyG+7eMllCiEvK/k4mBQtxh8NjgZ7H9Sksrt6tfqsr3LOPO 6Lw7u0/8obxI5yPWvWUYzuTCWWjQcvshyEXSNo6J/hOc9spzHVu8ZEPXlukL4I+oyBov cPVh1DFw8zSgIQjDqWD04CTmehQOUuhaUYUalhpcxGvzhf2qtoiPuVvCp0rMR8lMe0qk rY1wGfXrGfJfWY2Co45CRLBLZsPxkCOdshfqx//C99OncvYrHyWKjnOnRhtuK75TsXoh FtJ5xo0XFUFIpDd3nezJQioXa7j+qM8IVMJ0orq43SGyIPrhkyDNnQjtLNIQEtPA+6BD 3U2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=YXLDg5ydl9ELJKeWK/Osh3ILa9sBZAC3E6/b4CFouLY=; b=KOT02aXJ2tBv/tYtDDNkUdXhQGK8hBdB4W3biApvPznKhWVBffjz7ShNQvwltNOfbX Daoxz7xZWYCDgH09Z1isZb227CWk55kMtKtT+eZFjv8moKSXWJ7q7e7OSb74YQdiFDo9 ZJ2IHQa0rh+TWY7eQoxeo+7Ngyq/m8G2jVZh3Ah0ZYJLAXF5Htj8ThunBasvNjFscqDq y7wiuesdQi5zhLct5sa9l+lukgimR1NLyRGWeOWZs+EmCgkhKFlqp3E3KQnHMbAhv3Z7 M/pW8ONNHuqJh/XGVVcwSL1gwxK0eQrUpuM32fLjMqJ8jICW0HZYnzSHCQZS2sUTIKo1 UftA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qw12si2104973ejb.492.2020.06.11.08.03.46; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728280AbgFKPAK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:00:10 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:47186 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728059AbgFKPAK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:00:10 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-100-0-195-244.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [100.0.195.244]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 05BEw2xl023972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:58:02 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 2ED884200DD; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:58:02 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Jeffle Xu Cc: enwlinux@gmail.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix partial cluster initialization when splitting extent Message-ID: <20200611145802.GM1347934@mit.edu> References: <1590121124-37096-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1590121124-37096-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:18:44PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote: > Fix the bug when calculating the physical block number of the first > block in the split extent. > > This bug will cause xfstests shared/298 failure on ext4 with bigalloc > enabled occasionally. Ext4 error messages indicate that previously freed > blocks are being freed again, and the following fsck will fail due to > the inconsistency of block bitmap and bg descriptor. Applied, thanks. - Ted