Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1001566ybt; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:12:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3hTR27IowiqdPoMJlHQkbTe+D0wxsZ1YYfyyAj8q8PzAGcRpCZh28e3EfmZ6KTweozt4Z X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:830b:: with SMTP id j11mr6901507ejx.42.1592626331492; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:12:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592626331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h8nmSJwL56mqll+EFKZOj9odBEdd1eBPTm0GX/k+K8hB+/jsJTZA04jryKUEfEaYs4 ye3pYjjr3mPxJzejpwvOQt7JBCSnj1Oq0po9VJa/zXMnaaZRD6pUOHH3+coVUwZXsNlr Qi9sZDfKUiStBK3Ay2HnnQDrYt79Lh4fg/peX+I/nIhEPNvf7maIfE/iCllV4JLI6Sbr hhMeYv0BTzZI0zwC+f6WerpY4MnJE0GOWD0WDcbPZA0uKwBb8VwiEGWBreu6K6mFE5zU Y2xeMz2aKognrc2x64c7X8aUuP/rOnpzuxKuycdz0eq6PNj24PKlIS7gfAyYB2CwXrNm /oxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=6O44WYqXTWkj6uwHHPC7LrfX2ZSUKvJ/lD6qvXyaCmA=; b=PQf1Rblt7rlmH2xW2/EldDSW5a4Wf0txeNNZWB29HJZPwsK4z9SB+MKi5LQDw2SijY Jij7L5OMauTp4ALL0XijfIxgTZOJ2lOF56D+QFBXCiFr0/xSJDiJ6iPD/rGQ1IIeLreo 8GLLUS+2BiFG72mOoJonzsX0ELxtoieFHf/DupL6JzNaPNqz5fQ1d9SC2z8+QGZWHAfr sRW8ft9DT+jAYrxdDP6rHiyQT1/Hb1Fn2mr+DwgzzfbsyNvXwDQS2XajdKGfs1ddEXWm RqOI0Lhr4Xy1thHWW9tuZhvrY16EmSpdEcKSeFwPmLvSYFH/EJbMhJhQdAt1jBbCXH66 64wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z39si4973860ede.374.2020.06.19.21.11.28; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730935AbgFSRQr (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:16:47 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:54862 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729842AbgFSRQq (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:16:46 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-100-0-195-244.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [100.0.195.244]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 05JHGfWZ015662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:16:42 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id A859042026D; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:16:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:16:41 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Alex Zhuravlev Cc: =?utf-8?B?0JHQu9Cw0LPQvtC00LDRgNC10L3QutC+INCQ0YDRgtGR0Lw=?= , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: mballoc - prefetching for bitmaps Message-ID: <20200619171641.GA3963397@mit.edu> References: <262A2973-9B2D-4DBE-8752-67E91D52C632@whamcloud.com> <90289086-E2DD-469A-86E2-3BB72CAC59E0@gmail.com> <895DB4D0-0F00-4467-A87F-33222443615A@whamcloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <895DB4D0-0F00-4467-A87F-33222443615A@whamcloud.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:01:40AM +0000, Alex Zhuravlev wrote: > > Hi > > > On 29 May 2020, at 19:19, Благодаренко Артём wrote: > > > > Also, we have encountered directory creating rate drop with this (not exact this, but Lustre FS version) patch. From 70-80K to 30-40K. > > Excluding this patch restore rates to the original values. > > I am investigating it now. Alex, do you expect this optimisation has impact to names creation? > > Is plenty of files and directories creation corner case for this optimisation? > > Noticed as well, the last version posted to the list should have this problem fixed. I'm not seeing any newer version of this patch since the one on this thread, posted on May 15th. Am I missing something? What's the latest version of this patch that you have? - Ted