Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:41:45 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xfstests-bld PATCH] test-appliance: exclude generic/587 from
 the encrypt tests
Message-ID: <20200709184145.GA3855682@gmail.com>
References: <20200709183701.2564213-1-satyat@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200709183701.2564213-1-satyat@google.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:37:01PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> The encryption feature doesn't play well with quota, and generic/587
> tests quota functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> ---
>  .../test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude        | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> index 47c26e7..07111c2 100644
> --- a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> +++ b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ generic/270
>  generic/381
>  generic/382
>  generic/566
> +generic/587
>  
>  # encryption doesn't play well with casefold (at least not yet)
>  generic/556
> -- 

Can you update encrypt_1k.exclude as well?

- Eric