Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp40864ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 14:55:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNTxOYMrM4hIxYtholeqROh6dPi+g0FtExIkPGjuyTz/lA124Mbj/+8+5TvHuQ4i8FHHbB X-Received: by 2002:a50:cf09:: with SMTP id c9mr33565702edk.90.1594331748934; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:55:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594331748; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bM24Iwm9KVG9D6cLa7qt4sYxsPS8NP8t0VzaLDBFbYs6ao3SiuLhyf4L7UYF70ObGn PiGHgSjFcT71IrJaBnaEPCd9sDzikuIP3cbPcIhNJk2thYp/sEnOP2TtswpTE84QCvFx 6fSks+ku1NR42//3ob0EX5QnLAYrjMupEVwl3MogiyYmzKo8GqURP4Db/eEfntTZqI7O Xmm0wv3Pp+eoAgWrYRJ1br9bbvqwg3TAq9OWh5hEfeWlspG2Nmiay0WUGZR+fGBDLr2y 9DFp4xD2Vr8Nqqj/fzu/f00hDDfwrL86BPhIZ/T0VBkVZdz+vRAUOXMU0GjCajQGxA7c y4ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=cMxx3qnB7/j4yqqLbG8GFA5JvTwM3wBROf0HeT1sKCg=; b=AJwZTLZoyw1pYa9IU3ObC9iO2HjM+8x+7O4L/eoKsfCRgUGVlB7ePMdI5oRiJe+8hI rl4sPYBs1a+rQCnbkzl91zyq3tWkeLbUPcJlfVPHIE5EEClYRV029R9YDqpgytMzFV0Z wQQyT6BQbRerDvrgg4oq2vVIQRCtQeOh0TOCwjuBEtHwvgo5Nr7dg+MxMDE7R4s7PABf wwQnZATIQSqBiDvl74eGuy3/M9ZjwQ+lGOXAo0zGXfE55JXP40rZeIoV8x4kWe7e+Ayz 9itjhKsKlZa5FzIPsnB3IlQz2nZdj59qvF7zRmFMo7yEG1UyRdaMP7wARrw/J7QWkdUD OKsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=cdkjFt0U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17si2717541ejg.88.2020.07.09.14.55.05; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=cdkjFt0U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726213AbgGIVzB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:55:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41952 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726196AbgGIVzB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:55:01 -0400 Received: from gmail.com (unknown [104.132.1.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2723820672; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 21:55:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594331700; bh=17t7u5FxwRuwcW6rNtkihmGzGdOtOv+v6GD8suZEV3A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cdkjFt0Ue4fI7oesmV7oIhfgvjKMAvuK4weMQ7ZeIomAJzcsxEkDPbbh5xldjJfmp tFWjL3tgmhIE/NE2SHWnz+zmMJPFpkLgGKEDrWBmnasWoYSoeWMMTmqH6dm8F0RvgY qjFgRYIh+npFHQvidp2glKI5JuYgo711bveB1GCU= Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 14:54:58 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Satya Tangirala Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fscrypt: Add functions for direct I/O support Message-ID: <20200709215458.GC3855682@gmail.com> References: <20200709194751.2579207-1-satyat@google.com> <20200709194751.2579207-2-satyat@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200709194751.2579207-2-satyat@google.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:47:47PM +0000, Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Introduce fscrypt_dio_supported() to check whether a direct I/O request > is unsupported due to encryption constraints, and > fscrypt_limit_dio_pages() to check how many pages may be added to a bio > being prepared for direct I/O. > > The IV_INO_LBLK_32 fscrypt policy introduces the possibility that DUNs > in logically continuous file blocks might wrap from 0xffffffff to 0. > Bios in which the DUN wraps around like this cannot be submitted. This > is especially difficult to handle when block_size != PAGE_SIZE, since in > that case the DUN can wrap in the middle of a page. > > For now, we add direct I/O support while using IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies > only for the case when block_size == PAGE_SIZE. When IV_INO_LBLK_32 > policy is used, fscrypt_dio_supported() rejects the bio when > block_size != PAGE_SIZE. fscrypt_limit_dio_pages() returns the number of > pages that may be added to the bio without causing the DUN to wrap > around within the bio. This commit message is a bit outdated, since the latest version of "fscrypt: add inline encryption support" already makes IV_INO_LBLK_32 with block_size != PAGE_SIZE fall back to filesystem-layer encryption, and hence it won't allow direct I/O. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Can you mention any changes you made, e.g.: Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers [ST: split original change into separate patches, and updated to account for inline encryption no longer being allowed with IV_INO_LBLK_32 and blocksize != PAGE_SIZE] Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala > +/** > + * fscrypt_limit_dio_pages() - limit I/O pages to avoid discontiguous DUNs > + * @inode: the file on which I/O is being done > + * @pos: the file position (in bytes) at which the I/O is being done > + * @nr_pages: the number of pages we want to submit starting at @pos > + * > + * For direct I/O: limit the number of pages that will be submitted in the bio > + * targeting @pos, in order to avoid crossing a data unit number (DUN) > + * discontinuity. This is only needed for certain IV generation methods. > + * > + * This assumes block_size == PAGE_SIZE; see fscrypt_dio_supported(). The note about block_size == PAGE_SIZE here is outdated. I was also struggling a bit to decide what to name this function. Note that it's not really direct I/O specific. Also, fs/iomap/direct-io.c needs it but fs/direct-io.c does not. What this function really does is batch together the mergeability checks for a logical range. Maybe the comment could explain this better, and maybe the function should be called "fscrypt_limit_io_pages()" instead. > + * Return: the actual number of pages that can be submitted > + */ > +int fscrypt_limit_dio_pages(const struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, int nr_pages) > +{ > + const struct fscrypt_info *ci = inode->i_crypt_info; > + u32 dun; > + > + if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode)) > + return nr_pages; > + > + if (nr_pages <= 1) > + return nr_pages; > + > + if (!(fscrypt_policy_flags(&ci->ci_policy) & > + FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32)) > + return nr_pages; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(i_blocksize(inode) != PAGE_SIZE)) > + return 1; > + > + /* With IV_INO_LBLK_32, the DUN can wrap around from U32_MAX to 0. */ > + > + dun = ci->ci_hashed_ino + (pos >> inode->i_blkbits); > + > + return min_t(u64, nr_pages, (u64)U32_MAX + 1 - dun); > +} - Eric