Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:06:15 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: iomap write invalidation
Message-ID: <20200721150615.GA10330@lst.de>
References: <20200713074633.875946-1-hch@lst.de> <20200720215125.bfz7geaftocy4r5l@fiona> <20200721145313.GA9217@lst.de> <20200721150432.GH15516@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200721150432.GH15516@casper.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:04:32PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:53:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:51:25PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > > Hi Christoph,
> > > 
> > > On  9:46 13/07, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > this series has two parts:  the first one picks up Dave's patch to avoid
> > > > invalidation entierly for reads, picked up deep down from the btrfs iomap
> > > > thread.  The second one falls back to buffered writes if invalidation fails
> > > > instead of leaving a stale cache around.  Let me know what you think about
> > > > this approch.
> > > 
> > > Which kernel version are these changes expected?
> > > btrfs dio switch to iomap depends on this.
> > 
> > No idea.  Darrick, are you ok with picking this up soon so that
> > Goldwyn can pull it in?
> 
> I thought you were going to respin this with EREMCHG changed to ENOTBLK?

Oh, true.  I'll do that ASAP.