Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1441499pxa; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaQM+VoMKjSgX2kOn1ejL7CZjaPsaW6OdwQW1EcL/sOIx//0p6t89wDrnQgokPhICpK2AY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4bc5:: with SMTP id x5mr5511330ejv.177.1597332959149; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597332959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eXJTfco+LwDpof44Seenz//K7cfXtd37e+fc5RLXRXwhXsTu2F62K4QPztMyCabtzR LMo8N4EJPBU/9DNayN33Bwukbw/cRXTEP/SYNvdo6eaeV/qG+3baABrLI+CaLAetpbc7 pzxr8Tu038tf+fu22v3sEc5c9YGYMGyJ6m2w6pnJUAIdV0/lqLojvmlb2UHKy5RdEz+r mE0MaBDnUPJJ0YQgQmoufs8QD158HvIpdrhYStx69mdoFjPELZS240/exDZntJobXtjt +UfWCNHyW1raD4DdRcgjBxnGrqceCRxk9HNbccazoBOYCqWSOqEVZrWPUOK4ipLWANmj wxRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=wzZp+GpumCQLz7//UAkrY+3WtVLFxW4hL1TIQKinAbU=; b=TyfCxfM+P68+pqVLvLrIQ2wEK2Y5qArx80xqDpkyhcwix/xL3qVjjAgjeuiMHon8kg gzODQyJdTM4S5bnkre/6vWWCjJFV8F2S27p0HS8Ko621SOB9cnVNnoR118qgfwRUCuqk +8RT2XVhomxZ5zFZyRow0WKT797zjNKpKL+LfV52tgfZQhXPleSXExuYiiD06ppBop7C YWrLhNMCB/eVlRDjRLOyH8w3NohnK9CGQNhxXv2oi9q/Nt3Kxt4RPe1/qOrq8FeSKdSS JDH47EmQL1s5e80+zph3CAz8WUNcQ/pq0HVCWpjsemFU30aD+ps7kdLdTVg+8YSom7HU UxNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=CKbX1WC3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x7si3541010ejv.609.2020.08.13.08.35.35; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=CKbX1WC3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726597AbgHMPf2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:28 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:30316 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726249AbgHMPf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:26 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07DFV7bV021957; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : references : from : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : message-id; s=pp1; bh=wzZp+GpumCQLz7//UAkrY+3WtVLFxW4hL1TIQKinAbU=; b=CKbX1WC3ms185cGjUvKav5EWW19IIYxjA4C/7n1VCeaC8xTXwgl8bVq5eSDuEQ9KTeWj k5iMvw/hMmEnZnIdHdSKGBQaBCKyTLK0NK15pQdmr1rWG0mLtjhlY19pBM5VFGxg7GN1 fR4i0As3cXG3TMgqxXwLWCVOlGMItE2rBB4s7yYDFibGrM0yqWkryXibBpFjmlpzZtAA OdxkkR23S9iq5A2UuTDE24wLmt5XRo8i1Zy/IIQvMMZTOo9t4IJcJRYHcCfHWeH08Ez1 xwcoeNedkiDCdch+D8PJhrs2nQ4mHgdztrNBrUzisAVmxxm1miaRvH3qtYzjZG9V2sCq nQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32w4b9gqqy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:22 -0400 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 07DFVjiA025732; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:22 -0400 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32w4b9gqpp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:35:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07DFR6Zc000319; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:20 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32skp83gms-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:20 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 07DFZHjD31916414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:17 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF958A405D; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097F2A405B; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.199.33.217]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:35:16 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: delete invalid comments near ext4_mb_check_limits() To: brookxu , adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:05:16 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20200813153517.097F2A405B@d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-13_14:2020-08-13,2020-08-13 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=923 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008130114 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 8/7/20 7:31 PM, brookxu wrote: > These comments do not seem to be related to ext4_mb_check_limits(), > it may be invalid. > > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu Either ways these comments are of no help and the function has enough comments within. So we should be good without it. Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index 577ce98..aaefeb4 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -1743,10 +1743,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_use_best_found(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > > } > > -/* > - * regular allocator, for general purposes allocation > - */ > - > static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > struct ext4_buddy *e4b, > int finish_group) >