Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1456577pxa; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7fexYZ++fg/FnHE4fiTpICaC6+/HybXlnay4Sk4qe/caydywkKTYrH5qZjvL57SY1ebMg X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd15:: with SMTP id i21mr5364862edv.153.1597334048282; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597334048; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=buj9zBBytMRMzDTS3yxH9obGkAWEaA6TZCoecGHZxn5ShrP99scfyrpvVRnxGOIuPx OumzFyGo3amYDpquMi7zc7aizT9u2OnzSdTWaekegGp878ausS5IiZHxuh3ddzrngfTm StaShKVK0fpc1dMBqlNbSrDqAg+9nu1l/yPLCOfeD9C6Z8hhLmsIe12S6v+iH0dUNi0g dzZs5A4T2zqtUqtgyOUo9aRzCLKDXaldYlASLXGSwSpQhE7LFmh35Q3YkPP/eejgk68H WOvMd1pD1jpecdFjUUB4Mo84B2UCoFLcHULDyOKVgSz9TXVWPsorgGxh6c+eh5F1e5VQ 4Apg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=CRfN5S+co8EixlzodjZJii8swglZ26POxlT4p+o5d88=; b=iYVd7itBAAyaFqmD5Kfs4CS9EBr5g80u8zmCi9ZTucRRq8JVL8ZQVnhDMSZuqDHgKa FCm0VLibAy/xZsiRfZHj1E8+9+CeGX1+Jch9FARQfVW0+uZXl50QMEphPW97qkwJXCTz X+ezczuetDs1bKzINZU7uUmBBtx3klj/3dsCMwyQSwkICwAKlxcFK1lOGEIOxBZnVL1a bsPzBAjdWVQmL0BG3niA7ihzAk48DKHgFCVSaACI2xN4u28V3nsz+bIlUTeabzmquZi4 xvvxvHP6Cb5229PuwrxIAgyn6pt0Ljdo+6b0XTmLJQ2l+a4oa1EiIXsu6PSlDDlKUsjH moIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=SL79bhlx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t19si3417356ejd.62.2020.08.13.08.53.42; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=SL79bhlx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726305AbgHMPxb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33216 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726249AbgHMPx1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:27 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07DFWRZV036978; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : message-id; s=pp1; bh=CRfN5S+co8EixlzodjZJii8swglZ26POxlT4p+o5d88=; b=SL79bhlxCjGTyNwTj8fzY6Om5zV0MK0OdpUWgPiSbGH1PS20SvLfnYZ142xKTUwTSlne Ril8dAkx/FGVm+gIjhoEqRWh5ttfTW010a+PZljSyH/4dJ6nz1b0kW5IOT68HGLykmSm trhoi3+hHuQ2UxgNnbFWG0cv8wuTn2QCQIqfX9ez0K6BHeJ0U4EuFadzKYtDpwYXa0C8 7j+udswt77+i51GYVhB5Ys+p1owBfqprcxe8nZLbg5moO+wODZYZtc9noJsLKe5YdXzq MEhM02Rnv8bA+67jejggc4O8+aBpHpf6AmV9Ne0Loyw7ZpMPbmCqOnmIk6ZysNzh5uyu VA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32w6vcbbxf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:21 -0400 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 07DFWRIq036961; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:20 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32w6vcbbwq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07DFiQ1I030527; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:18 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32skp85qgs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:18 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 07DFrG5r11796754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:16 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8292DA4040; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989BAA4053; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.199.33.217]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info To: brookxu , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , adilger.kernel@dilger.ca Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: From: Ritesh Harjani Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:23:14 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20200813155315.989BAA4053@d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-13_14:2020-08-13,2020-08-13 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008130114 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 8/7/20 11:50 AM, brookxu wrote: > Rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info, keep > the naming rules consistent with other variables, which is > convenient for code reading and writing. > > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu Other than the points mentioned in the other email in [Patch 1/2], (related to --thread and author signed-off-by) this patch looks good to me. Please feel free to add, Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani > --- > fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 14 +++++++------- > fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > index 16e9b2f..69240b4 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi) > > printk(KERN_INFO "System zones: "); > rcu_read_lock(); > - system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks); > + system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_system_blks); > node = rb_first(&system_blks->root); > while (node) { > entry = rb_entry(node, struct ext4_system_zone, node); > @@ -263,11 +263,11 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) > int ret; > > if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY)) { > - if (sbi->system_blks) > + if (sbi->s_system_blks) > ext4_release_system_zone(sb); > return 0; > } > - if (sbi->system_blks) > + if (sbi->s_system_blks) > return 0; > > system_blks = kzalloc(sizeof(*system_blks), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) > * with ext4_data_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same > * time. > */ > - rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->system_blks, system_blks); > + rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->s_system_blks, system_blks); > > if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG)) > debug_print_tree(sbi); > @@ -333,9 +333,9 @@ void ext4_release_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) > { > struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks; > > - system_blks = rcu_dereference_protected(EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks, > + system_blks = rcu_dereference_protected(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_system_blks, > lockdep_is_held(&sb->s_umount)); > - rcu_assign_pointer(EXT4_SB(sb)->system_blks, NULL); > + rcu_assign_pointer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_system_blks, NULL); > > if (system_blks) > call_rcu(&system_blks->rcu, ext4_destroy_system_zone); > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int ext4_data_block_valid(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk, > * mount option. > */ > rcu_read_lock(); > - system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->system_blks); > + system_blks = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_system_blks); > ret = ext4_data_block_valid_rcu(sbi, system_blks, start_blk, > count); > rcu_read_unlock(); > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h > index 8ca9adf..d60a462 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h > @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info { > int s_jquota_fmt; /* Format of quota to use */ > #endif > unsigned int s_want_extra_isize; /* New inodes should reserve # bytes */ > - struct ext4_system_blocks __rcu *system_blks; > + struct ext4_system_blocks __rcu *s_system_blks; > > #ifdef EXTENTS_STATS > /* ext4 extents stats */ >