Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp26275pxa; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQbpWuh/3KYTlwD10yJMxa+n3c7NOYg5Zil0sHp3mCpAN+IozzSBN4YVcQWn2nyIotc/DT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7fc9:: with SMTP id r9mr168763ejs.407.1597367704500; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:15:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597367704; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DOc6frHaN1mnTVOSnffuup/pnmj3Icrp5mUM81yPeh/+sc26fda7FW5x+K245bxZgL FN0puofzjVFZRIWjRtfNVcvDCWIVilzXTMk/QS4XaNALR9tevDeluPMEmFajlLPJWYzB ikRRRpPfz98rpbjGtwtcKbOfzszSXm4IplbihD/pgreRq2n9bgCuQxjldX8KYL4F9KrV 5hzwIFMBg3JWE01fvaOxHolRFJjruHQX+p4Zs6ukhr/oE3TZHkpzJhW42/rH7CbSwhXQ 2npJD+JoRBKMJc2o2aupJKAoe+T8LUgHMDsuFqNs+dAnLnVovruPeRGzkFycsqep5Ie/ QI1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=didrtgmgnxY6k00MqKnJp68dTOcrvVR3skgKpcsT0AI=; b=lXn0SY3mPXBhoZDxeX9jRS1ltXpQptTWdU74VTCbsnnix/Ci62foQc/vi1huHiV+td OVnPm5Pr7mB8vidYafzesdu27z99dTL6cAwL7EDPiMQLp0eeZBptkYNPZVbPqmvaIMA4 +sAVWQZCvE5mwDRqtNDw1yxMWRDxC7BvHdAd12ORzJzvMPuev/Y0hvG0xBtGXwleU/+C Ke/l15qkrBS6gkf83f4mjjc1Lveahs3WrYDwbTUfwvBiAoGCLqnL52K5JiuA5woLjFFc p5J893OBqdeWP5EmCEsfchKLr7Lw24x52ZyGheMwsNjQXDCgHKIFOmS5cyhmCOSs9C+v dAUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=moteHZx3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rl3si4372634ejb.643.2020.08.13.18.14.41; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=moteHZx3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbgHNBOI (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:14:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726522AbgHNBOH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:14:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA62AC061757 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id x25so3753670pff.4 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:14:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=didrtgmgnxY6k00MqKnJp68dTOcrvVR3skgKpcsT0AI=; b=moteHZx3cO8PdmEKl2HWL3tGi5FqWVhmV4g1MMVEaLi67OkNhFU3v+S5pL6mb+jHx2 pYij6aCNUf0Trnc5xrkoRemr8vrfnYJywYy7W/L2RcC6qj89yHqEymNkWlUYyRl2B8AT 0Qz6kdRzFne3cX/D0vcK8FR2kqTyVCIwtOC7eJqQT2nZjFf1bxKyMtGPv4ZG98Zx55ke G7TPesQdTjP4QU5R5Ha8RKdNQX2R0PVRZcllYjxb7A86e92G36DSUl1/ttSkEfVv+SSh M2iUqQkxhLGrXFXJtaoonA33nPrhiKeMzSiDfBGmRv7Nu7pUwBeC581PrsRXZsXntCsY HBAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=didrtgmgnxY6k00MqKnJp68dTOcrvVR3skgKpcsT0AI=; b=QyJujj0dxe1edhOZ0Ip2EVvbQrzYXOW2O4DHbZZ6SCFJYxGPnACU1XpS/jtESP5DK+ Io95XkwFNXf42QwshfTmIudvRIS630ZCz6Zud9WR4pDAH2rhfjoYXeIOrz5nexJGr2sD ZL+WTkmkXQFRf9LceMAkG6t9VKmHPSLe+8SsSxkccM7NpoYdGDLN2cJ/GoU832SDrVKR uFGBbc0+OykW40Y9RXd6dkP+o9eqnZCAqJMhrfHobIWqroKqbIZ+JEdCL0klblQFMU+x DVoKvBvNrxOZvXja4TmIjwizLTPUXmzLwKjj0t8JzWgUqV7JRzHsvSPPjTwp5xZ9vFtF Kfeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xU8j4D+QcS0SxvnR90eVeUyIOZ3v2gfayDJKICQ2Q4IS6+htd VacwvVobV+ICAEIuSUi3z7Qdx/Zj X-Received: by 2002:a63:9dc2:: with SMTP id i185mr188689pgd.203.1597367647276; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([203.205.141.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm6495246pjc.15.2020.08.13.18.14.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix log printing of ext4_mb_regular_allocator() To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Ext4 Developers List References: <131a608b-0c8a-1a2d-57ee-4263cfcdd5a2@gmail.com> <8A79C6DA-5C0F-4B4F-9EEE-E272993AD0FC@dilger.ca> From: brookxu Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:14:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8A79C6DA-5C0F-4B4F-9EEE-E272993AD0FC@dilger.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This suggestion is good, I try to update it in the next version. thanks. Andreas Dilger wrote on 2020/8/13 3:36: > On Aug 7, 2020, at 8:01 AM, brookxu wrote: >> >> Fix log printing of ext4_mb_regular_allocator(),it may be an >> unintentional behavior. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu > > The debug message would probably be more useful if it included some > actual information (PID, status, fe_group, fe_start, fe_len), but > that isn't necessarily a problem with this patch itself. > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger > > >> --- >> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c >> index 5d4a1be..b0da525 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c >> @@ -2324,15 +2324,14 @@ static int ext4_mb_good_group_nolock(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, >> * We've been searching too long. Let's try to allocate >> * the best chunk we've found so far >> */ >> - >> ext4_mb_try_best_found(ac, &e4b); >> if (ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_FOUND) { >> /* >> * Someone more lucky has already allocated it. >> * The only thing we can do is just take first >> * found block(s) >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: someone won our chunk\n"); >> */ >> + mb_debug(sb, "EXT4-fs: someone won our chunk\n"); >> ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0; >> ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0; >> ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0; >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 > > > Cheers, Andreas > > > > >