Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp913780pxa; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 04:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyKHXsqrOtJV6j2K8SrrCHJqIkwwxE9C/2ks5P5W9WymsjghHvFefT5U7SGSxyu/3NI15j X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:85da:: with SMTP id i26mr7370578ejy.458.1598096326168; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 04:38:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598096326; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A3/r390T73RNl7KIU4BgEvdVTIPtB3yjsfCIqt0CJw4UZrmzdOYDK46hpCgXd6bFH6 rWMi75f6KmZoprHhc5jDeO4xTR6Vyp0LTvkMR4t92JmmYa0/TDG4Z7omXw6LZLfdENpy YiAT+i3kJvCeKBZxNXzMC67YMkHtTCTMfyE+KO5KA9CZv/Ykz6BAlG3obpexJ3nCPH7L tNdoGCYwS7e86x+QEwXcwCiBVWD4rkjuBZ4bvgDTeCjgNpb8OLdRBfnLRgwO8XdMxROo Caz5Lvfue3Fl1yZxol1OsdGG5QLKQk0/ikfrsEJSwNvXM4u4QXnH12fFVsA3liF4YIft epYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=JoSzpGKZktZepI2WPW3YZ+KFJZY13W5BEURnHztssno=; b=TNSLSp1i2gAjb08CbB8gIo8gfkS66zsZVUg8iXvkGzCx/sF3YmIMV3XRa3jGy9cskG WQ+K6vYzcAr7K+twQIUye02nAwyB9qHAwkB6RB6XXZs+NjS4LIzvNUPg6dEXSlQqBMAT HiTRoePnpj7FVQJgB2owF9mTyNvhIDi7sANWBKIFwB4py0GmbFbShq4XYjJLsJ9lO7lU qV98Ui4p+k3iSxj9+lD68G2w1MELYxZXqlpx0IV5eTsJ4RsRQK7ENMBQMHgFmIrYAi/q x99rXaM7/2vx5RZUtQpFPPgMH5V7JyuwdCZDK6izMshXhrcG1rND6AHHYqp+YeXajf5R qIVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=AD5+qjO5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l23si2905278ejq.620.2020.08.22.04.38.22; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 04:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=AD5+qjO5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727975AbgHVLfP (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:35:15 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52892 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726920AbgHVLfB (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:35:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07MBVdhD140106; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:34:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=JoSzpGKZktZepI2WPW3YZ+KFJZY13W5BEURnHztssno=; b=AD5+qjO5XeP7yzRYtq/pOrQ3FlvYZHWTv4V5hIFNuLvqHJWjsDCjeIw4/VhpdgonM4Vf ZHYhpiKYojal7JCM0Mi/QgFyXaAbAOF9VeAA/OdtN9V6jRFW1vBCIuBHsID7h5X1t2k1 n8xpi7Bkrhc0WKEmmuEulioLVpZYnsUp0z4GqwtbpRW+I0uEAw4qS7kZpXuMhCfaGkeU gbrhYhXM9a54Qsvh2yVF8AXIAuipgFFx8tdmUzKXiAdrHlOc7YeutJH/ssKidPbxTznt K1S0VLT0gd6MODYV6+FPmxCpGdSL9UaUWx+9bo9+YKHzGV2PkhxqtLnHJIDySNUQYa19 BQ== Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 332yj2tvgx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:34:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07MBX3W7021785; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:34:52 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 332utsrara-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:34:52 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 07MBXKqE64618988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:33:20 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B69052054; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:34:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.33.217]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9825204E; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:34:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, Dan Williams , Anju T Sudhakar , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] ext4: Optimize ext4 DAX overwrites Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:04:37 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-22_07:2020-08-21,2020-08-22 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=792 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008220120 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Currently in case of DAX, we are starting a journal txn everytime for IOMAP_WRITE case. This can be optimized away in case of an overwrite (where the blocks were already allocated). This could give a significant performance boost for multi-threaded writes specially random writes. On PPC64 VM with simulated pmem device, ~10x perf improvement could be seen in random writes (overwrite). Also bcoz this optimizes away the spinlock contention during jbd2 slab cache allocation (jbd2_journal_handle) On x86 VM, ~2x perf improvement was observed. Reported-by: Dan Williams Suggested-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 10dd470876b3..c18009c91e68 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3437,6 +3437,14 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, map.m_len = min_t(loff_t, (offset + length - 1) >> blkbits, EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK) - map.m_lblk + 1; + /* + * In case of DAX write, we check if this is overwrite request, to avoid + * starting a journal txn in ext4_iomap_alloc() + */ + if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && IS_DAX(inode) && + ext4_overwrite_io(inode, &map, true)) + goto out_set; + if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) ret = ext4_iomap_alloc(inode, &map, flags); else @@ -3444,9 +3452,8 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, if (ret < 0) return ret; - +out_set: ext4_set_iomap(inode, iomap, &map, offset, length); - return 0; } -- 2.25.4