Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp692942pxk; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzwFIZa7jRGlmecv7L/ku2SuStJVaI2AzVIZ2RGWba+jylqmuioAekIzl+7CDI244mLYzJ X-Received: by 2002:a50:f1cf:: with SMTP id y15mr1186566edl.204.1600893126724; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600893126; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qp4AuTvcpYXGejHGwW/LJxxubYdFOOd1w2JdRVZJiVkGssGn8Ccd3rpcjPjZS1HxSj MUwHgNAzODBoTaw1+BqG29iUixcOgCYOaeXzzrTENURX1RWmrdT1TsonRHUHjka0u/5Y m8zRcXvunqFCtFXEZBRogrYWCw+NGOz6w+60R5wf+9aMUcCzD3Xvra2kxGH2q9vbxrcB 2iRqbGRGMv5OwAhXiT2c/aWVWcB6mkHWUcEx3vRK16nb4Lbax/xTncknLspJ2I+tHAjR LkprgZNhcVhO2QF+CrxQI+oYtF9/EJjdwpi2h0pXY4cZOVWT/m6p8fTexcrrJ+e6X600 OFzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:organization:subject:cc:to:from; bh=RZF+60CHg/BC1ljaATYS2ajzuq3zBkpLEZWbLRHtPIM=; b=LKp96tZBgC6FSojDvOZ+++aQ2Vy7V5ltLPGKpBZrQbjkhukNLtImMaFJgaXDAzIkfX BZURCtLXDUAHReXkZN/xx0RZYjFyINCzIKnz8rK33/5T2YB+1bg6UJ9B5QBCzYhV80iu e9Dlj69VxzxAlFWgyQCo39AsQmd+fV/oTV26BQzgkMY1XiiCKfhpTYjN0zrjDVtkebnu YnKxPJHCnpxihhpwH5NC9KGKcI7wITPWrrR+bkxhbhkJyj0BjCKEH44PK4cg5qDtiNN7 cmD7gBr3eYSS+fjFIXehCG3NEumxaTMlanSAvd7PotPeOrHljYWn5XfTqMo52AMdvstR Wdcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e26si672054edc.216.2020.09.23.13.31.42; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726699AbgIWUav (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:30:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32832 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726199AbgIWUau (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:30:50 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1739C0613CE; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: krisman) with ESMTPSA id 3695329C66D From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: Eric Biggers Cc: Daniel Rosenberg , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Jaegeuk Kim , Andreas Dilger , Chao Yu , Alexander Viro , Richard Weinberger , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Use generic casefolding support Organization: Collabora References: <20200923010151.69506-1-drosen@google.com> <20200923010151.69506-2-drosen@google.com> <20200923054714.GB9538@sol.localdomain> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200923054714.GB9538@sol.localdomain> (Eric Biggers's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2020 22:47:14 -0700") Message-ID: <87o8lw5j7u.fsf@collabora.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Eric Biggers writes: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:01:47AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: >> This switches ext4 over to the generic support provided in >> the previous patch. >> >> Since casefolded dentries behave the same in ext4 and f2fs, we decrease >> the maintenance burden by unifying them, and any optimizations will >> immediately apply to both. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg >> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers > > You could also add Gabriel's Reviewed-by from last time: > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/87lfh4djdq.fsf@collabora.com/ Yep, I was gonna say that. Assuming nothing changed from the last submission in the other series. Thanks, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi