Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp388807pxk; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwT55s+t0rw2GuIQPBPTf8M8s04LJHZl8JX3UJQBXBJoNesiToQsBbrF9MKo3UkCqRBZP1r X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a44:: with SMTP id a4mr315203ejv.492.1600959787401; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600959787; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cVTg7/XdlI9T7W49+UV8s57pQ3wlOKOLcj7v3kjrfE/OFHQkUNuMzY8ZiqeE1l/k+V WgktdvvnELzw0v16qyhCOfCQpTbDBpCFZJmbHUCWaoD/UFL16MQV+raaTDg+7lQrM48w yy0lT1l9ifdIM/KGDSHItXy4UYYGl1pwndJwLw9rHRPtgjPwbcTujf4xrTiBGXrwJW+h UuF0Tep8dGdGMVS0TZkNCA558f/uVwAo5Sb8ggGcYxGfukwC9d6zIbnZn5yk2Cnx7Lrn XUKJOJWNujN8EUORXqvtfN6pF3ZQi9y9RUqwMcVJgG/h8V93nZLnAXaA7lMo9IY5tz2m bwtw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Kfxv9OKPM4Ckt7ysyD5KBfXq37hZKwXWs0dOLCPfM7Q=; b=loQ5A6KP/533EA9nzH/m7/+FRIcnfV/wpRElG4eC5yglNjB/8lGYUy8NzcUc0G9Qw5 SFSh2A1mqifEIJbrUD7feLuqToP5/qah3NXALjXwy1IJd1GJlrc/HZ6/tEDIguHOzMRJ XF+5ydqRsbxq1NDKJZP7cNrd3dayR0ytPPvnezNW1CvOmPHZnJ0ISdeGovHVrnzRRd+T es3Jyi2+vOrazMYGO8jaU2Nt8ltkuxoeGJefaeFzIByQfAr7bupxyuu1MDmzygFiNKmJ nwXE5iVG17NWVnG00U7OWZZlQddR4ZJa7WNp0lzanPUWDP/qoewbCiRNpUWx5No7M1Ri Ct9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cq28si2277079edb.474.2020.09.24.08.02.39; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728215AbgIXO77 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:59:59 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:50066 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728184AbgIXO77 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:59:59 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08OExX5F019000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:59:34 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id AF2DC42003C; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:59:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:59:33 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Ye Bin Cc: riteshh@linux.ibm.com, jack@suse.cz, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ext4: Fix dead loop in ext4_mb_new_blocks Message-ID: <20200924145933.GG482521@mit.edu> References: <20200916113859.1556397-1-yebin10@huawei.com> <20200916113859.1556397-3-yebin10@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200916113859.1556397-3-yebin10@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:38:59PM +0800, Ye Bin wrote: > As we test disk offline/online with running fsstress, we find fsstress > process is keeping running state. > kworker/u32:3-262 [004] ...1 140.787471: ext4_mb_discard_preallocations: dev 8,32 needed 114 > .... > kworker/u32:3-262 [004] ...1 140.787471: ext4_mb_discard_preallocations: dev 8,32 needed 114 > > ext4_mb_new_blocks > repeat: > ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry(sb, ac, &seq) > freed = ext4_mb_discard_preallocations > ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations > this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq); > ---> freed == 0 > seq_retry = ext4_get_discard_pa_seq_sum > for_each_possible_cpu(__cpu) > __seq += per_cpu(discard_pa_seq, __cpu); > if (seq_retry != *seq) { > *seq = seq_retry; > ret = true; > } > > As we see seq_retry is sum of discard_pa_seq every cpu, if > ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations return zero discard_pa_seq in this > cpu maybe increase one, so condition "seq_retry != *seq" have always > been met. > Ritesh Harjani suggest to in ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations function we > only increase discard_pa_seq when there is some PA to free. > > Fixes: 07b5b8e1ac40 ("ext4: mballoc: introduce pcpu seqcnt for freeing PA to improve ENOSPC handling") > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara > Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani Thanks, applied. - Ted