Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3913237pxu; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:51:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5JGl0wLQo+D7V+9/ctoiITeNyutXy76qMdgv1qVDZAPwsJg4A784KcLcrW8RaQXvcWPoY X-Received: by 2002:a50:cbc7:: with SMTP id l7mr13871501edi.148.1602503474412; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:51:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602503474; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MIg8pgahhEpYmf+Yx8V/YGnFNiSPq+arIQXMr2JhVCv6bmLVPUnOjWOI9B0L3gLJhd TPrmUVD1Xga/CiAm4EBQ+WQTEAxjWzEeas8enMstxBJsxECt3E/vS6lVSiyt1j1Bvup6 9QbvIN3btPEFKqrdHBx0mRqZNQReCpap11flozcT5iUXnqKyFRjvxrTw1Z9MrByy1LQq eR9WZdz4nwMQmLd8f2d0QI97StLA1CzstQALVC0Ucjy1cE6FdMcT54EM0huL0X44QsIv ycHvDwYKC2n/ZtsVvx5sXG1K6QKkeAseBHFi8xv/nCZuUM+rFlTs0lAfEzF7kSau4Gw9 Yf6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=US0oAZx9cEThm/fltbRSd7fgdIFU1JWLz46V8VamZHI=; b=c2vxz3s2GX0LseZ0aZiuFZz3NJM4QH22eS6VB6ABogFovgw61WsMu8ZKhPDeM+h6Oa Zgpa6Q16A81baMPn08dG+P7wiADvDDNBmc7dJtjrDGEtVuspxAY31l99GdjkKxgPlrbg CXXMKXH0Bq7DTUtrzfKblq2xodB7LwTlBIXONA3ee8MnKuQJ9kV0Rt+4TQ6M/x3jt4u0 SqCVQjPqdJ/bGruDl5eK5phOcCMOxwfj63mxZNIh1umbLqZkNt2vxZqsWZUci18NfJNl qFtugmGDa6w4Ce3KoMc6GAUnGkjSPkGpABDB7cCXffDY47lU71P1zwobmHlCJM6lEPmC 6yTQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n12si6876587eje.169.2020.10.12.04.50.44; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388209AbgJLLuD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:50:03 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50084 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388118AbgJLLuD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:50:03 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08D2B251; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B50731E12F5; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:50:01 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Ritesh Harjani Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Eric Whitney , Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: xfstests global-ext4/1k generic/219 failure due to dmesg warning of "circular locking dependency detected" Message-ID: <20201012115001.GD23665@quack2.suse.cz> References: <2eb09d70-b56e-2c0b-8ef4-0479d7be2bb3@linux.ibm.com> <20201012110347.GB23665@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201012110347.GB23665@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon 12-10-20 13:03:47, Jan Kara wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri 09-10-20 22:59:13, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > While running generic/219 fstests on a 1k blocksize on x86 box, I see > > below dmesg warning msg and generic/219 fails. I haven't yet analyzed > > it, but I remember I have seen such warnings before as well in my testing. > > I was wondering if others have also seen it in their testing or not and > > if this is any known issue? > > I don't remember seeing this lately. What mkfs options do you use for your > test? I can see below that mount options are apparently: > > acl,user_xattr,block_validity,usrquota,grpquota BTW, I've tried and the problem indeed does *not* reproduce in my test KVM setup with 1k block size and default mkfs options. But it does reproduce with mkfs option "-O quota". So it indeed seems the lockdep annotation is somehow broken in this config. I'll have a look... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR