Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp103012pxb; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:39:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+9CWTPhcU/mhEPpAtvZ2KrQUkRgf99UZVUrl85nAX6XBrD8jXDfVqzBieYtDzKu3sAjUO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fcc2:: with SMTP id qx2mr29649826ejb.549.1605159595775; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:39:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605159595; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Fp5E7gVgD+SI3hO41iFWTufW51OLYiE9jmfczj68UFhOcHvQnDHiwwq9dtBMfF1z/T nvZw9M3+Eoo3g2FAI6vIHtqKttk2cAxy6EeMrrRZh5duHx9MykrT7zsAwodLOBLQvmUm fsJpUWyYLP+V+gdH4XN4X0sQ0Nmq4IBGd0p6AyhMEwghWddYrh0KsvEkAfcPm+b/zvzY ddNyHNFtrk6g5DAJxBRB+eABjZ6zinTNeNf1qnKI6GaWOj9J/IcfwuSVubAVlHT1N9Tk nxaAwF0fCrCEc7vZfvSNuriyKEIGYsJs455XGB2IkmHWG7Vo0QPjDfXQkbO1t16LeObc 8ClQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=TPVBYTjJe0hHmPnczFzGKQ6IA34dXAh8mCwAyisyNuc=; b=gZa9G+ZKI2/GSD1wxCwGtHWWrpWQc4JNsq6HrwC7QSoLouDN2T7bpqF8iBfO6pOETc 2ulFVF6EDWjZI81fSfE1DDxJn7P5rr7sakRWnSGnVzbNWQmTIIrDJwAsYd1SseJnZ0Yu xi45vITtZf7qvUb5HJ0FWO6a8iVcKp0ZBV+8WUmY9byt33/36xyiybA3C4v8TBZCPQ6V WruFMFUTNkZPolbJCBPEh1zT0PgGZsJGmThC7QH8AUNDpFBMg69w7pHZPK4Z4oRf3BN0 U0f5ZDbuXquI7/x1Z76qn4T54C8LwZZILIO5aXLuFyMz4ZKlGvFWuCmm/9v5BNV49O+F Uxfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HsIKmy2m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b13si3229816edq.75.2020.11.11.21.39.20; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HsIKmy2m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727593AbgKLFhz (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:37:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34456 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727925AbgKLClA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:41:00 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25529C0617A6 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id e21so2875275pgr.11 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:41:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TPVBYTjJe0hHmPnczFzGKQ6IA34dXAh8mCwAyisyNuc=; b=HsIKmy2mHTXPwQWLxT4t4wMTLWDqRF5L0W6i0qLwHTLP0BTicyOwRlVS/u3RGVkS3C RJu4DtUK8Lh1VeQ0Fs8R5cbJEOb/KIkknyTWSIlbVMHhwEeu7GDekDQ/SV18yfChQ43u f5vBpgZwYvIZXfftSHO6UNWQ2nO1I3Cblgwuwic4geXh3UcAEcVGpwC88AbQgivqgoih 5Qk4grVFGf2rvo2ZlDamtz3W2G2rSwLcQNC+AHJ4Ef7IfjYB5tNvaoZKN+2kjzfT9PFn e5JMHTGUxFXQH+qS5+PJ/EIdj0wMijhOFFGs6yDsANBc0YNo66B2zmJuqpMIiwdoAcWL a3wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TPVBYTjJe0hHmPnczFzGKQ6IA34dXAh8mCwAyisyNuc=; b=nJWY0tbjlkjWfnS94hRf1r2KE3zxlTthK3zxF2Rg2nOuYx1+IjOb5qnP5ixKczcczE 9qsyLgTgiwljsMz2lJDf7pnVowq4YVYEmMjVUMHHXyIO8uI7c7RiIUo3uQ82JZ4TZE3g oDco9J8hB4M/XLDdgq2WUuT84Xet0UiG8+p5Q0/FrGPJoGAXcEuVfyotlGH9PP8jwbsB wks6iBoes+dKSYuE7bn4lH1wFNSWQpbJ0QIC9oXs4VdHWiWbJ9U00KPoXLs+U1zozXmH kEukKGB+H8NyYUjy0bWXtKgHhV6MuXrhTL4eY1pDjO2QWOP5s5fFKb7n3pDXjy4DNRIj /kTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bzgYn2omTOKej9YBQwJSAEqa6k1wBkkMRsvjd4dnSnQnWmrEn gmnncO0lrrFNAOvojeiXOcEUrGtPzt3IEA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:2cc1:0:b029:18c:85f5:864b with SMTP id s184-20020a622cc10000b029018c85f5864bmr502272pfs.29.1605148859471; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (154.137.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.137.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4sm3814925pjo.6.2020.11.11.18.40.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:40:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:40:54 +0000 From: Satya Tangirala To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: fix inline encryption not used on new files Message-ID: <20201112024054.GA4042272@google.com> References: <20201111015224.303073-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201111015224.303073-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 05:52:24PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > The new helper function fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() runs before > S_ENCRYPTED has been set on the new inode. This accidentally made > fscrypt_select_encryption_impl() never enable inline encryption on newly > created files, due to its use of fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption() > which only returns true when S_ENCRYPTED is set. > > Fix this by using S_ISREG() directly instead of > fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(), analogous to what > select_encryption_mode() does. > > I didn't notice this earlier because by design, the user-visible > behavior is the same (other than performance, potentially) regardless of > whether inline encryption is used or not. > > Fixes: a992b20cd4ee ("fscrypt: add fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() and fscrypt_set_context()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > --- > fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c > index 89bffa82ed74a..c57bebfa48fea 100644 > --- a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c > +++ b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int fscrypt_select_encryption_impl(struct fscrypt_info *ci) > int i; > > /* The file must need contents encryption, not filenames encryption */ > - if (!fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode)) > + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) > return 0; > > /* The crypto mode must have a blk-crypto counterpart */ > > base-commit: 92cfcd030e4b1de11a6b1edb0840e55c26332d31 > -- > 2.29.2 > Looks good to me. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala