Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp72167pxu; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:00:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1mBOU++9g0WUwLJtmUQDt3uFzI5q5TVLaKAp+HetuHMNAguX4BtVAjWXD7NJd9L0T3oDJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b56:: with SMTP id v22mr1633188ejg.145.1607054433770; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:00:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607054433; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g9N8AMOXWOrL+l81Bx1jTjuUQnkwqyqSN5ZuWuevsTiI3tyKvdzg7mI3UAeTrojjW+ 064ufVmiVlCQpLCIfzvd0NhwEszSN4jvK6Ra5n0V06AzDq3rLFdOifZaFR/0jo4ln+F9 kUVod4uUom3sC4Zm8Fx3LMo+Dx0GZYFDdPeWFu8o6zxu9aNTvH50WdU6Q6Oj/GT6NNgs hbCxQH3dnJuQYywcSu68/6boOSSMsspxTGqA+A/01SVxR145TZAdT+yNeCMYdaW5jYQV W2xieLio9hFKavUliZ5QxswXRopEC/q7T8xIGSsFypcipUI0Wg0/85qHGUw31ecBeKW3 bEQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=jQv72CDDKW4fzHHGFMciWOnlRSCdehNGjochw6rqf+g=; b=jXeiZL6HwM3lKFZYX2nZxN4NjcT9iWeKRV0T2OmiRM+Dms8jOfAPSwvqMo4yM3byAj HS+i2i8tUjrMelH9On0hV7iWFQlPYZneEyg3RK7aPvjETKj0+T/XDrmXxzpTsE2RRPKr hA2JpY1Glp+vwKwolu6t1ypiAPRTcrVapWnNRud/8BiYeMYHHtHspZOqZNe90SlKA+Gj Mu3ZXfIbKcvYv2QOKie5zreu19Fip2+2y8HWagRY6cgz9qpV7lQRK5ifCdiNmnkwaCUZ YWj76fEGlnFd7t/6ENzhC6ASXeLkCXu2cN+uvKNHsFAqmA6kadPwp8AuL+ngvAYqVBVG KUDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=oLRa+3fB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17si609099ejk.231.2020.12.03.19.59.43; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=oLRa+3fB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727561AbgLDD7b (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:59:31 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:29322 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727168AbgLDD7b (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:59:31 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B43WrKr136621; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:58:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=jQv72CDDKW4fzHHGFMciWOnlRSCdehNGjochw6rqf+g=; b=oLRa+3fBO7YaJeUhsxWsHzyH20uiHeInz1Oxslv5k7oOfAvtISqH7PkcBQN+/Dw/J1we pYEhYZbrKu2sJN7AN/5VeahboxMMW/45E22vpme6k4nCGVilvahcktBsVKdc/c9uFXBt Y/s8M5na0QydVXIL88bUV9FlMWHQ62aZ1sXcGCATweSzhbqFp2ypFSf/02ZR56XfAxA7 hsn8/tgo+2JeX5pajZ7gOCokqX7cgcIIi6jrgxDilacbsZP5ecQbN2WxpDOWRWS7ZV/l MJG/a8f/PgMpdWmaKPzcyenoXwqf9gU5vQhBsBE32lDLt0sasftHgovz07+JgcMz/v3C 9g== Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 357734rq5w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 22:58:43 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B43l6AT018042; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:58:40 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 353e688p1u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:58:40 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0B43vNGC9110144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:57:23 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C614203F; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:57:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E095E42049; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.46.245] (unknown [9.199.46.245]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 03:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] generic: Add test to check for mounting a huge sparse dm device To: Eryu Guan Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Christian Kujau , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20201101162427.GF3853@desktop> From: Ritesh Harjani Message-ID: <622a8ba2-0e50-77d6-a6c5-4a91b991afb0@linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:27:20 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201101162427.GF3853@desktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-03_15:2020-12-03,2020-12-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012040019 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 11/1/20 9:54 PM, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:14:52PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: >> Add this test (which Christian Kujau reported) to check for regression >> caused due to ext4 bmap aops implementation was moved to use iomap APIs. >> jbd2 calls bmap() kernel function from fs/inode.c which was failing since >> iomap_bmap() implementation earlier returned 0 for block addr > INT_MAX. >> This regression was fixed with following kernel commit [1] >> commit b75dfde1212991b24b220c3995101c60a7b8ae74 >> ("fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block > INT_MAX") >> [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1279914 >> >> w/o the kernel fix we get below error and mount fails >> >> [ 1461.988701] run fstests generic/613 at 2020-10-27 19:57:34 >> [ 1530.511978] jbd2_journal_init_inode: Cannot locate journal superblock >> [ 1530.513310] EXT4-fs (dm-1): Could not load journal inode >> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani >> --- >> common/rc | 10 +++++++ >> tests/generic/613 | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/generic/613.out | 3 ++ >> tests/generic/group | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/generic/613 >> create mode 100644 tests/generic/613.out >> >> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc >> index 27a27ea36f75..b0c353c4c107 100644 >> --- a/common/rc >> +++ b/common/rc >> @@ -1607,6 +1607,16 @@ _require_scratch_size() >> [ $devsize -lt $1 ] && _notrun "scratch dev too small" >> } >> >> +# require a scratch dev of a minimum size (in kb) and should not be checked >> +# post test >> +_require_scratch_size_nocheck() >> +{ >> + [ $# -eq 1 ] || _fail "_require_scratch_size: expected size param" >> + >> + _require_scratch_nocheck >> + local devsize=`_get_device_size $SCRATCH_DEV` >> + [ $devsize -lt $1 ] && _notrun "scratch dev too small" >> +} > > Seems there's no need to introduce this new helper, just open-coded > > # comments on why we use _nocheck here > _require_scratch_nocheck > _require_scratch_size $size This does not work. Bcoz _require_scratch_size will create a scratch file which I guess it will check at the end of the test. If not there, then it reports FS as inconsistent. I get below errors with above open coding this, as you mentioned above. generic/618 138s ... _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop3 is inconsistent (see /home/machine/src/tools-work/xfstests-dev/results//ext4_4k/generic/618.full for details) > >> >> # this test needs a test partition - check we're ok & mount it >> # >> diff --git a/tests/generic/613 b/tests/generic/613 >> new file mode 100755 >> index 000000000000..b426ef91cacf >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/generic/613 >> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ >> +#! /bin/bash >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Christian Kujau. All Rights Reserved. >> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Ritesh Harjani. All Rights Reserved. >> +# >> +# FS QA Test generic/613 >> +# >> +# Since the test is not specific to ext4, hence adding it to generic. >> +# Add this test to check for regression which was reported when ext4 bmap >> +# aops was moved to use iomap APIs. jbd2 calls bmap() kernel function >> +# from fs/inode.c which was failing since iomap_bmap() implementation earlier >> +# returned 0 for block addr > INT_MAX. >> +# This regression was fixed with following kernel commit [1] >> +# commit b75dfde1212991b24b220c3995101c60a7b8ae74 >> +# ("fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block > INT_MAX") >> +# [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1279914 >> +# >> +seq=`basename $0` >> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq >> +echo "QA output created by $seq" >> + >> +here=`pwd` >> +tmp=/tmp/$$ >> +status=1 # failure is the default! >> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 >> + >> +_cleanup() >> +{ >> + _dmhugedisk_cleanup >> + cd / >> + rm -f $tmp.* >> +} >> + >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks >> +. ./common/rc >> +. ./common/filter >> +. ./common/dmhugedisk >> + >> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test >> +rm -f $seqres.full >> + >> +# Modify as appropriate. >> +_supported_fs generic >> +_require_dmhugedisk >> +_require_scratch_size_nocheck $((4 * 1024 * 1024)) #kB >> + >> +# For 1k bs with ext4, mkfs was failing maybe due to size limitation. > > I think that's because only 4k blocksize ext4 supports filesystems > greater than 16T. > >> +if [ "$FSTYP" = "ext4" ]; then >> + export MKFS_OPTIONS="-F -b 4096" >> +fi > > I'd check for fs block size after mkfs and _notrun if it's ext4 and > block_size < 4k. So we don't have to overwrite MKFS_OPTIONS and run the > test multiple times forcely in, for example ext4-1k config & ext4-4k > config. Yup, I agree with this. Let me send a v2 addressing above comment. > > >> + >> +# 17TB dm huge-test-zer0 device >> +# (in terms of 512 sectors) >> +sectors=$((2*1024*1024*1024*17)) >> +chunk_size=128 >> + >> +_dmhugedisk_init $sectors $chunk_size >> +_mkfs_dev $DMHUGEDISK_DEV >> +_mount $DMHUGEDISK_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "mount failed for $DMHUGEDISK_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT" >> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-$seq >> + >> +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 1m" -c "fsync" $testfile | _filter_xfs_io >> + >> +# success, all done >> +status=0 >> +exit >> diff --git a/tests/generic/613.out b/tests/generic/613.out >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..4747b7596499 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/generic/613.out >> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ >> +QA output created by 613 >> +wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0 >> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) >> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group >> index 8054d874f005..360d145d2036 100644 >> --- a/tests/generic/group >> +++ b/tests/generic/group >> @@ -615,3 +615,4 @@ >> 610 auto quick prealloc zero >> 611 auto quick attr >> 612 auto quick clone >> +613 auto mount quick >> -- >> 2.26.2