Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp113079pxu; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 06:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzt98ajtQXJvEfk5nKjOI7Slz8TmDfKjPzVDe7I+ViT2FixHSJxLL4gYVVQnQeVUUZY+JMd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:55d0:: with SMTP id z16mr69858564ejp.466.1609857258340; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:34:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609857258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pEiJ+g4dSPYnbxwb7likXZwcfDN3/sygai6X8H8BAnOgf/jO4ZYyHSAxGJjRgMOmk+ P+4yEbbRfBIYk8saRLZiTyHraCcKf8bsvshE6XJMTc7zNbZBqjWHVlNm5B+p2VoS2sH6 Nccw7+0Q7A6F1UuIb03BzROAy5DGHhqc4gstPEhYpdiDNT6JiRLmMf0UHd6iNj6eXmUN u+PZlocax2h+wCTjptrtB8oUVZpiTAXufIgXJLpkh5c466QqydEOH9s1IZXEyOY1Yl/p smLfry+rtOdWHIQjRUp571rqKbsIs0dClrhw/c7CI7NHMfu9ZOFCaw5DunLCM6cv6xNF Tj+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=VjOyvlwRQ8IN757uWSoatarB17Xy/ESK3JmlD7zhSzw=; b=YeWjr1iYE1N4QNsF0aS2oLN2YDqDFTwABKAJc6/5H+80BCwhjublQNt/XJZmZLHnpu 85EXnTcf/6qe4XfAcmF8jLTDrjhK33IoIwlbIeXRr8+8v40t0D2zg9Z3Ia//05Epyo2f HaBqzNRJedM2fAoHfYaamSpP3JPixDeKg/FUmX7/Ozuu93/1+9Jjf5P8XTNVC3W6/8r3 XEVEyysg8nz+9/hcEvy7DfHUNLyw/JaaLuEMJ51Uev2wK62xmIZ/MEjRzuW2pKIyWLU3 XrTPekVG+ZhejSbVh5RCiLjdkRLcGgR9lKriHWuo408R7oVZsC6lbwC4TGm+FabN8xNC qDnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Q82bEc6D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ay25si34412986edb.8.2021.01.05.06.33.49; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Q82bEc6D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726350AbhAEOdC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:33:02 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:30696 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726076AbhAEOdC (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:33:02 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 105EW9f6071208; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:32:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=VjOyvlwRQ8IN757uWSoatarB17Xy/ESK3JmlD7zhSzw=; b=Q82bEc6D5A4V3Q3Z/1RlTKKNdAii4rHl19rG4de5xMgHS2C0zbfN59KlYw5HwsFAAaZZ 24Ek3lOt++lVKTf4B2+ZUdB8QkFN92BIT4jLr2WKaR2Xo91auicM+klrxc2YTRe3icAb ayO1yRlt1U33XhOH1unI0nEWUBNk1UgjVZTe7ePDtTd/rHmysEeTjXZkGN9PWXFzzMOJ JPcHCSblMIPMxvtrI6z3CcbBUjC0tXTrcuWc3JbmoigaovoMgiPs6SuCvB2NUedx3cFO iutVBOOuSS45TQKXvE7g+mAdeT1/t8onM4cbXbfRcPbeo/J6GR51iSTCQH1+iopRr5w/ Nw== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 35vs671rpe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 09:32:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 105ESAKd030134; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:50 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 35tg3hhhg4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:31:50 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 105EVmZS41877910 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:48 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155B4C050; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB5D4C040; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from riteshh-domain.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.199.32.130]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: fstests@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, guan@eryu.me, darrick.wong@oracle.com, Ritesh Harjani Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] generic/496: ext4 and xfs supports swapon on fallocated file Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:01:43 +0530 Message-Id: <12d1420a4a3fe6be0918a8a13a1960db47032330.1609848797.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343,18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-05_02:2021-01-05,2021-01-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=728 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101050089 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org ext4, xfs should not fail swapon on fallocated file. Currently if this fails the fstst was not returning a failure. Fix those for given filesystems (for now added ext4/xfs). There were some regressions which went unnoticed due to this in ext4 tree, which later got fixed as part of this patch [1] [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1357275 Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani --- v2 -> v3: 1. Removed whitelisted naming convention. tests/generic/496 | 16 +++++++++++++--- tests/generic/group | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/generic/496 b/tests/generic/496 index 805c6ac1c0ea..1bfd16411b8a 100755 --- a/tests/generic/496 +++ b/tests/generic/496 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # FS QA Test No. 496 # # Test various swapfile activation oddities on filesystems that support -# fallocated swapfiles. +# fallocated swapfiles (for given fs ext4/xfs) # seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq @@ -61,8 +61,18 @@ touch $swapfile $CHATTR_PROG +C $swapfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1 $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc 0 $len" $swapfile >> $seqres.full "$here/src/mkswap" $swapfile -"$here/src/swapon" $swapfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \ - _notrun "fallocated swap not supported here" + +# ext4/xfs should not fail for swapon on fallocated files +case $FSTYP in +ext4|xfs) + "$here/src/swapon" $swapfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \ + _fail "swapon failed on fallocated file" + ;; +*) + "$here/src/swapon" $swapfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \ + _notrun "fallocated swap not supported here" + ;; +esac swapoff $swapfile # Create a fallocated swap file and touch every other $PAGE_SIZE to create diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group index fec35d8e7b12..30a73605610d 100644 --- a/tests/generic/group +++ b/tests/generic/group @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ 493 auto quick swap dedupe 494 auto quick swap punch 495 auto quick swap -496 auto quick swap +496 auto quick swap prealloc 497 auto quick swap collapse 498 auto quick log 499 auto quick rw collapse zero -- 2.26.2