Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp429951pxu; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:29:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWW2VuIxzrBfdCEooYFd9l1PnsQ4tCbhJiBzRD5sCuwjMP1YLasMxdddhUATIrR/krMIzv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:c1c:: with SMTP id co28mr2225302edb.287.1610036945965; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:29:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610036945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ncQlOangrKKqjsHMqq3XJoId9p1yCFiGmrDI2W7J5REQhTans2uHCAijHZh3g8C21w UiTuxnb7WyzAj6x1VDQ6ey4LkehE4lh8VwyLPP153OapmgW7b8a8cFDkn7gdVjxjDMdw h/glg4jVK8smbZPRFH6XR3JYPwKcET1oJFBcASa8HaD8b3SkQmKhinPV9eFxeZOM6+9a 8mvLRtHby1PP/fVpDsHPkovAJgwmT3lALh1daMNxyczeDmnEA+/Seu1bZfZI/L8CK0xT z8AfW6VxAAq7+7lx8hLtmwqYnjRmdSic4En5+z7LypvAP+gD+HfFUwGwsmo2DV/0I50N W/cg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EvbKKixWtAb30XwiH5rFCQMwAUrHLtBKtZBHEJAUjmU=; b=vVM9aR1xlPVB6w1x6pUyP3UWjSHnZtovljj22jQJWL8sfORtgeiOSagcURYRsW/WOd Gl9VT5UhRSysYYFr0Jz1pF6XY8mAmdwetS7hc7mwkv7qVLPhpYvvW+bO887TvB8KoSKG 10z1tk0/q2SoK/wLIzH+Dq3RhBeoSlTjSsqz8jBz5rG8JL81BERdfv4PL7BOdFy/4wZC maAhHI3ZPsBM8WP+EulS/cQn8OrhvL7W+FUELaC6YXhgDkfLjof2BbYgq6zbPyYWzMJM JLPbEYthStSRKGqfs60HkFzwoBOnDy4yMJu6vmvkCY7YlJkbg6a/TVd68+UjaYefxcyV zwcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sb9si2538042ejb.655.2021.01.07.08.28.39; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728585AbhAGQ2X (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:28:23 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:34255 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728060AbhAGQ2W (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:28:22 -0500 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 107GRMMv023672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:27:23 -0500 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 3176915C356A; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:27:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:27:22 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andreas Dilger , Ext4 Developers List , Linux ARM Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues Message-ID: References: <20210105154726.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210106115359.GB26994@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210106135253.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210106172033.GA2165@willie-the-truck> <20210106223223.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107124506.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107133747.GP1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210107133747.GP1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:37:47PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > The gcc bugzilla mentions backports into gcc-linaro, but I do not see > > them in my git history. > > So, do we raise the minimum gcc version for the kernel as a whole to 5.1 > or just for aarch64? Russell, Arnd, thanks so much for tracking down the root cause of the bug! I will note that RHEL 7 uses gcc 4.8. I personally don't have an objections to requiring developers using RHEL 7 to have to install a more modern gcc (since I use Debian Testing and gcc 10.2.1, myself, and gcc 5.1 is so five years ago :-), but I could imagine that being considered inconvenient for some. - Ted