Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp2339141pxb; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:14:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzu1sgCeliOKWdpDENn++iKiqsra5k2z5z0678nAtHd8DHC0j0eRCf+/zhfCoBKb8+GhiAl X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d146:: with SMTP id br6mr11091617ejb.331.1610378092021; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:14:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610378092; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sled3w5V5fz+G+tGXtQO0Q2tDTD9ecjs0ErHPlH2TqUq3/HK2CbD+VO7rxJlh2BqTj 9rOuSFNjdbd60fILa+Exx3+eyeIvkpqOC6ofPH8LvyLj2SPfEzXL6EfryhwthWmSRBKS Jy560YjZzvuxj3pG3M8eaSjbbD8fRR7ria/tJ2CJKeGCibzUshpg27RdnvIzO3ye74/F vPc5goNr1KyTyqSabaWB9nd/tTyx4B01buQZyCAFHPn/1ncmLbvrVw+goufqUxdM4VUO So+0uSqN7e7J8qtp6lDhupCMv9DEIk03IICtZuHnuG1WboazgbLDo46/+DNTg3+JLKua XNzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=BE8Q7EbFdfK8p1KWDuQrFCi7ZiyHO1y04kvGhQifKBc=; b=SzOZmZQlNgDNJavCVJBlCbcbJ/J2aIEdKWAgC0c1BM588GPkfVBRvwelqr9JdBCl7D hDn4TF9NBVIDrp91DLN87OzEH4STkhKzp9GiLdLjrUhtX9MEks7w6eKhmHkduLQhJc11 FKpV8dbK8VvoafYYkBalxuBeeZEsxMe5NeujOFmeX3TAUyrUte57TDEijaG1Hup0FKKt kBpsH5qWhsVRG1EnwrzFgCtUCW6IHupAvaxNcFqe+KJmMl7Bv0BNF5T5y1ujamQ8bncd h/TG+xXKnZIl2LTB6PXuRR2SK1AZlz5WA6clMz73yyxUaPnZDL5llXiqEZWaloIYOTLZ kwCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y15si9633edu.550.2021.01.11.07.14.27; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726459AbhAKPMD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:12:03 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57324 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728562AbhAKPMC (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:12:02 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFB2AB3E; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 868C51E0807; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:11:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:11:20 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Theodore Ts'o , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: simplify i_state checks in __ext4_update_other_inode_time() Message-ID: <20210111151120.GJ18475@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20210109075903.208222-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20210109075903.208222-12-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210109075903.208222-12-ebiggers@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Fri 08-01-21 23:59:02, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Since I_DIRTY_TIME and I_DIRTY_INODE are mutually exclusive in i_state, > there's no need to check for I_DIRTY_TIME && !I_DIRTY_INODE. Just check > for I_DIRTY_TIME. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 4cc6c7834312f..00bca5c18eb65 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -4962,14 +4962,12 @@ static void __ext4_update_other_inode_time(struct super_block *sb, > return; > > if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW | > - I_DIRTY_INODE)) || > - ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) == 0)) > + I_DIRTY_TIME)) != I_DIRTY_TIME) > return; > > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); > - if (((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW | > - I_DIRTY_INODE)) == 0) && > - (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME)) { > + if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE | I_NEW | > + I_DIRTY_TIME)) == I_DIRTY_TIME) { > struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode); > > inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME; > -- > 2.30.0 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR