Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp300583pxf; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 01:14:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6fEPXyl2ZDjSZVqdbQB18ZPr/l9iJ8/hmlbTYwpL97/3q5rdRaPlgyrPOmIpQJMKOdmOe X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3596:: with SMTP id y22mr8491152edc.207.1617264890046; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:14:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617264890; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BMRjBObLps5nq6VSuVulkHxkxi0CvXWDpY5CZz88gYIkex4Wd+d7YBr82MxltzGJbu eUbCX/9oPg3Xh7jg+QIOUrghVYYMyG05/iGRyZ962UwlUMh/LzMAJ+yro9IPgQVqxUJQ /N2mN0kpvif/S6FykEGtBZKjb5cWtuLbJvaNugjmPgKI7y/yOP0xCwOhImSbkP2B55vB lR4gAyBNizcBbYY6VSFcGRicomU+8nZlbElSBdM6ImXb62KDU7rHPkHuGFvLXCvndLJ7 7Qmr9UkTFtAB1nu6eZHLNcmGo7QlSEqTMW+KfsYaJINwK4q2vXdzFICVNje1jphueiLZ HMjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=NEuRGUsRuiepP1M5AEiPS668Z0lvjiZNNXs3oJ6uAvQ=; b=cLZb5e69Eev6Z9JjQrA4b+MdVHEa2k6KILL5H7oHoalM4CqTZiQAnKpnUTWextKFiE wx/GiYkqmBZlrsh0PdQ1yyybh9o60Yq3KddeLO3LIcF4ZaXdNT8vSAFKgoLbLn1svqGP 5v3wW02jOargWqNzz5k4PL2AXG9DyZnrGNnWt4GKL5YEAOjrrqip1lLJAHYQvzCQr3/y 81gLyIemE8y3GA0H3I99D/beXS1ERUmPyW7gMgHCn4trlgUg/V4w/j9lqO4M4wKo0Y3q xde2Uu79EKTc0lKkp9CGjkq/YxnyFEagSIXLsaU60Q0cwB/JigHCmvIeS2nATyBJq4W+ s3BQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qk9si3748845ejb.474.2021.04.01.01.14.21; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233185AbhDAILZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:11:25 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:14664 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233143AbhDAILN (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:11:13 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F9wmb2jSYznX8p; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:08:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:11:02 +0800 From: Ye Bin To: , , , CC: Ye Bin Subject: [RFC] ext4: Fix fs can't panic when abort by user Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:19:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20210401081903.3421208-1-yebin10@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Test steps: 1. mount /dev/sda -o errors=panic test 2. mount /dev/sda -o remount,ro test 3. mount /dev/sda -o remount,abort test Before 014c9caa29d3 not been merged there will trigger panic. But 014c9caa29d3 change this behavior. Fixes: 014c9caa29d3 ("ext4: make ext4_abort() use __ext4_error()") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin --- fs/ext4/super.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index b9693680463a..acb75dc396f8 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -667,9 +667,6 @@ static void ext4_handle_error(struct super_block *sb, bool force_ro, int error, ext4_commit_super(sb); } - if (sb_rdonly(sb) || continue_fs) - return; - /* * We force ERRORS_RO behavior when system is rebooting. Otherwise we * could panic during 'reboot -f' as the underlying device got already @@ -679,6 +676,10 @@ static void ext4_handle_error(struct super_block *sb, bool force_ro, int error, panic("EXT4-fs (device %s): panic forced after error\n", sb->s_id); } + + if (sb_rdonly(sb) || continue_fs) + return; + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_CRIT, "Remounting filesystem read-only"); /* * Make sure updated value of ->s_mount_flags will be visible before -- 2.25.4