Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:45:28 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 RFC] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races
Message-ID: <YGyQKEamNgszxE+d@mit.edu>
References: <20210120160611.26853-1-jack@suse.cz>
 <YGdxtbun4bT/Mko4@mit.edu>
 <20210406121702.GB19407@quack2.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210406121702.GB19407@quack2.suse.cz>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:17:02PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
> Note that I did post v2 here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210208163918.7871-1-jack@suse.cz/
> 
> It didn't get much comments though. I guess I'll rebase the series, include
> the explanations I've added in my reply to Dave and resend.

Hmm, I wonder if it somehow got hit by the vger.kernel.org
instabilities a while back?  As near as I can tell your v2 patches
never were received by:

	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/

(There are no ext4 patches on patchwork.ozlabs.org on February 8th,
although I do see patches hitting patchwork on February 7th and 9th.)

Resending sounds like a plan.  :-)

	      	  	  	  	       - Ted