Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp1296782pxy; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:09:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGRl4YOKdAunbG2rsZ/Wswr9CiFoqgcFkQvTMCwalpR8nuacZsAfX2iBiSHfRotoShfVc4 X-Received: by 2002:a50:9e0b:: with SMTP id z11mr17662388ede.228.1619694552654; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:09:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619694552; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SUBCDFP6bFNU52BtkHYDV4wRuJ8F/QT7zpgDVGuJCcUPoc4ECQCeh47WPZQjw1Cs+b 8htSU8iW0/oTUfb3/Y/YpDrbyPI90zqlvqruDo5F7Ze0MoDdeosw6MI7cBFREHLLvvuV W5nWWs4GsJelQDJFXHIbkVSgUgKPbAkz7Q0NNUYh6XFoJ99MZjrYWcNuV0fSCw/M1FSK sSJotVX69aHvrFb+8nxGXApClVs8Ywp/vwqHQL77WgoA+cqOp54RtMsGbkftffSTbxff 9gFJNRZYi5wr/JMEAojFS/KpzApBrzc/1nHNB7sBX09Vh337n6ux2XitAz67TOT/4ryV T6Dw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Yygg84Sqz7tFZ7poeLqPsydlYQ9P2Ikd5S+jATfOK8k=; b=uXiQoBcoLGKjj1oHfMy4tN2dJI5tvFEkkrFYGIvfWKSc9HaIfMDZLWlXIUOB3mYZBr kxvd9p2kkJ5SOK/EN2iRQHshdO76ozsVv0zb8xvKUKDlXkt+0YyERHmGMrD9ti/YbLnL aamLiP/aq0nDyRstvjfd366yjN7nIuawvgfyEOmTbA2Y+wJ6mprQYtJE3InFXYcf0OGn 2/2TNHl+tIFv6CJhtvwX/AumbzdGruC+YPh6Z0x6MiDbUmpLpnPsp1tMwM3nRdUwd5tG 2RrY0csyh7dQMm+BY2sT4+3+uGGCSfT5dtDeeZEh4wirDRcacE389tmiv5+yA0VHBtfl d6LA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kzL6VRRu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f20si2805740ejx.483.2021.04.29.04.08.26; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kzL6VRRu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232803AbhD2LJD (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:09:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52348 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231904AbhD2LJD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:09:03 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ADAC06138B; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u25so37630127ljg.7; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:08:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yygg84Sqz7tFZ7poeLqPsydlYQ9P2Ikd5S+jATfOK8k=; b=kzL6VRRuThAkLZrXOJp03XQzoLfbrqzhOI7k8SNoZpa8Yenh5Bp1ZDCcC6zJLrhaL9 IGCPMOShrm7Eo01oNiSn5WT38kKGRfiiw0lUHOeKHoXQPUU2Yhxn6p2sp4K1nrwsvTMQ E9rXRl5SWqa+u+YTvw5czuo86+IFHfEf0LbtSiFx2CEGAj/M5i0thUp9flRN2nket5mN nUmLNUjSq0V+etp2d+TNTWYSmZ1q1ATQ0BTCv0KBFV9KoQiIU/enQ1WSP6nDGNPkYyru mJMeIdcCsfQQSx1f98Q0XnwOlzb47nNjsTTpIQQ0+2aQNwlCvGwbNLdRWZX+SDqUyqX+ ygnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yygg84Sqz7tFZ7poeLqPsydlYQ9P2Ikd5S+jATfOK8k=; b=QEyS6+vVE3MYupbruasPkOwJNejgSp+Sjja3yH/RbM/plh+jERQGZeCRrpuRgHFbXR qCGVUuB33GDoIhve2GEl5AnUMoI1a9YXOJ04QD/XXZgjgLQp07RukZfZwnJypXEI7gEI lTsnSGSuQqagiOjVS7W4FMGNThnlSWkCNj69/G3AhMRJiOuKHKJJmppBaOvyXi00iyax nfLzBtnoYWJZDZNRsQHCOT3VOFK4PJL2iXC6nMLeNjrnLVSJD+lt7bDiF0gJjGZOeaZY G8Z0ZbLj/HbVOXyyF+v5HWJhaktT4qxKsp98XA22u3u1k07n0EeqBtIu1VgsBcHcIyzx FtTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53253KUiGodimGdPJLH/UDbC4xauLBSC8KkE4Ktzy0DvVj8WP1LH tv+M8+vtXGx2SoyU8Sx/Pg1WqeWUcoD2ow== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a552:: with SMTP id e18mr24074014ljn.383.1619694491955; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([94.103.226.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z22sm496575lfu.200.2021.04.29.04.08.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:08:09 +0300 From: Pavel Skripkin To: Vegard Nossum Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+d9e482e303930fa4f6ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_fill_super Message-ID: <20210429140809.5929edd0@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3c3877a4-fef2-9e24-f99f-2ecc46deb7e4@oracle.com> References: <20210428172828.12589-1-paskripkin@gmail.com> <3c3877a4-fef2-9e24-f99f-2ecc46deb7e4@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:01:46 +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote: > > On 2021-04-28 19:28, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > > syzbot reported memory leak in ext4 subsyetem. > > The problem appears, when thread_stop() call happens > > before wake_up_process(). > > > > Normally, this data will be freed by > > created thread, but if kthread_stop() > > returned -EINTR, this data should be freed manually > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+d9e482e303930fa4f6ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Tested-by: syzbot+d9e482e303930fa4f6ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin > > --- > > fs/ext4/super.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > > index b9693680463a..9c33e97bd5c5 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > > @@ -5156,8 +5156,10 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct > > super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) failed_mount3: > > flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > > del_timer_sync(&sbi->s_err_report); > > - if (sbi->s_mmp_tsk) > > - kthread_stop(sbi->s_mmp_tsk); > > + if (sbi->s_mmp_tsk) { > > + if (kthread_stop(sbi->s_mmp_tsk) == -EINTR) > > + kfree(kthread_data(sbi->s_mmp_tsk)); > > + } > > failed_mount2: > > rcu_read_lock(); > > group_desc = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_group_desc); > > > > So I've looked at this, and the puzzling thing is that ext4 uses > kthread_run() which immediately calls wake_up_process() -- according > to the kerneldoc for kthread_stop(), it shouldn't return -EINTR in > this case: > > * Returns the result of threadfn(), or %-EINTR if wake_up_process() > * was never called. > */ > int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k) > > So it really looks like kthread_stop() can return -EINTR even when > wake_up_process() has been called but the thread hasn't had a chance > to run yet? > > If this is true, then we either have to fix kthread_create() to make > sure it respects the behaviour that is claimed by the comment OR we > have to audit every single kthread_stop() in the kernel which does > not check for -EINTR. > Me and Vegard found the root case of this bug: static int kthread(void *_create) { .... ret = -EINTR; if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) { cgroup_kthread_ready(); __kthread_parkme(self); ret = threadfn(data); } do_exit(ret); } There is a change, that kthread_stop() call will happen before this . It means, that all kthread_stop() return value must be checked everywhere Vegard wrote code snippet, which reproduces this behavior: #include #include #include static int test_thread(void *data) { printk(KERN_ERR "test_thread()\n"); return 0; } static int test_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *data) { struct task_struct *t = kthread_run(test_thread, NULL, "test"); if (!IS_ERR(t)) { int ret = kthread_stop(t); printk(KERN_ERR "kthread_stop() = %d\n", ret); } return 0; } static void __init init_test(void) { proc_create_single("test", 0444, NULL, &test_show); } late_initcall(init_test); > > Vegard With regards, Pavel Skripkin