Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp1221576pxy; Thu, 6 May 2021 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypY0udDZ2KEBOXfjTJILqjKnFB6yWs/6RmmrJMH0l24IT/3viuaRbdY6wO7U+xsmxF7Voj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2308:b029:28e:d370:d435 with SMTP id h8-20020a056a002308b029028ed370d435mr3935349pfh.31.1620296410056; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620296410; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0StyoDIxsLYjfeqimgjlFh9xlF/yPPnKiapcsGS7xbyd5uEkkdNLXYALBIg3nN7XqP CusTBE7XyiZoF9Gwk9QJKgO08JED4DS8AMzjZMUJX3WfvSICzFGwXAWlsWYSkITOUHbB XhzHWU5TFvMGn1e2pWGryK4BFP78QGEA3c6x0VoTZFUcXcb2QAFSlWdYgjsKB4qJ9UHL J27spfBvoxp8wPRBuKhLnkuNJIy1OIt/ndlqWK3DU/PNb42yuFe18M8+fHPhXhEAL4pT 1pV3duiIt+3UKm0wtLPEMeS0nSPLCBBrkJ901wY62hS8dGWuAGQfYrdgVuOgZgG4iiGc R19g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=OUbdpO56Xt5Ji1ueAdrfU8QD7qySMsmfQbZBmoAmEl0=; b=YVRClBDxmPzRp+YWTqSLovargP3mhSO23ruixPj6SICCS/SOMMU+5alNWZyoQncBVK vRNVzD+um6WcyH6x/Ee5DCxxnFIteCOBkAZ77qiPdtyIFxwsyyqL2tVpz2am6yUO6SIM TdUC2bP+r2+tLWN4EOB6jHI8S1IrAmw++oPm82/ENT6Ellk+ZlTldV1DDRYmdHlwZoJz w0A+obu+9TK1UH9fLezWJgihVVEzKfkqVhf2ynJ89jdINEIRufwMwRV+XUjTL3Xl+K65 t71StUSfsaM2In7EQ6NTaPjSWgeqYgoU24+vRSpxip60yIj13B+C1aUSOt9MznvIxk3P Vvng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a10si2681257pls.150.2021.05.06.03.19.54; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233816AbhEFKUP (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 May 2021 06:20:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55002 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233416AbhEFKUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2021 06:20:15 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014D8B175; Thu, 6 May 2021 10:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7575F1F2C60; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 12:19:15 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: yebin Cc: Jan Kara , tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Fix bug on in ext4_es_cache_extent as ext4_split_extent_at failed Message-ID: <20210506101915.GA22189@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20210428085158.3728201-1-yebin10@huawei.com> <20210430125853.GB5315@quack2.suse.cz> <60921135.3030900@huawei.com> <20210505104105.GA29867@quack2.suse.cz> <6093A830.3000704@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6093A830.3000704@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu 06-05-21 16:26:24, yebin wrote: > Thanks for your suggesttion. If you have no objection to following > modification, i will send it as V4. > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c > index 77c84d6f1af6..f9cbd11e1eae 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c > @@ -3206,7 +3206,10 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle, > ext4_ext_mark_unwritten(ex2); > > err = ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle, inode, ppath, &newex, flags); > - if (err == -ENOSPC && (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT & split_flag)) { > + if (err != -ENOSPC && err != -EDQUOT) > + goto out; > + > + if (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT & split_flag) { You need: if (err && (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT & split_flag)) there, don't you? You don't want to zero-out if there's no error. > @@ -3232,22 +3235,23 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle, > ext4_ext_pblock(&orig_ex)); > } > > - if (err) > - goto fix_extent_len; > - /* update the extent length and mark as initialized */ > - ex->ee_len = cpu_to_le16(ee_len); > - ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, ex); > - err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + path->p_depth); > - if (err) > - goto fix_extent_len; > - > - /* update extent status tree */ > - err = ext4_zeroout_es(inode, &zero_ex); > - > - goto out; > - } else if (err) > - goto fix_extent_len; > - > + if (!err) { > + /* update the extent length and mark as initialized > */ > + ex->ee_len = cpu_to_le16(ee_len); > + ext4_ext_try_to_merge(handle, inode, path, ex); > + err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + > path->p_depth); > + if (!err) > + /* update extent status tree */ > + err = ext4_zeroout_es(inode, &zero_ex); > + /* At here, ext4_ext_try_to_merge maybe already > merge > + * extent, if fix origin extent length may lead to > + * overwritten. > + */ I'd rephrase the comment as: /* * If we failed at this point, we don't know in which state the extent tree * exactly is so don't try to fix length of the original extent as it may do * even more damage. */ > + goto out; > + } > + } > + if (err) > + goto fix_extent_len; And you can move this if (err) before if (!err) above to make code easier to read and save one indentation level. > out: > ext4_ext_show_leaf(inode, path); > return err; > > Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR