Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3331738pxj; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCNTnWE/5yvKFyfyaC1lYSwVUATOCgozzdfHW5qteSBDvNVFDnU+qTv5hOIDIPtvmc1JwL X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:10ca:: with SMTP id rv10mr22741083ejb.377.1621855428206; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621855428; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ri4RN1MEhqqZfbO52V0Q5xjLcVSu6ZIFJcFjrS8W6DVqCweTlf/0YGfkzZxF42zSO3 m6bAto3S29jeoOVa34Y+6IJufqlloHY9GPYEOTERdP8lzcGfiQKkKy2DPopMANuErzID 5SQe6ofJrUosvXqiM/9j2qOrbnP5Et4Qdn2VvepT+XuYdqZwoJBVwYEPAMG7+IaAIcic +kOOjbS5VKvh+lUDGSrmXB89Wc02W0qdggvKNRbNUnordi4SfmjM108G0uYRVdadOADi bg+UWyH7cZfY7V6yPSlU6GLSFuEVK8ViQTtOUPDw0NHmXBqWtyRHyZnln+lpiEHiIN1h p6Iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc:to:from :subject; bh=4H2n2sC6PdRK/NgOV7oBnHON899eMdekBKoaF/+n/wk=; b=ceS73GMmDUmn83CaBu+XPW9PcSqM3N/XUZFDek3vRimwtVY5KOX9Z/MfQAejDuPiQs /mfHusLGGTwAbvgz3/HtttnL9Tbnb/NVWr0aZNm3OZFo4AY6eEd/P79A9ILCrKG9PHMr uPs2HmO1hKYZOoBUFjZ2ikYuwVqcV4fvQheWEcVJdRRvnd46tPXoKCvuc5kzbdbK5JHq srhJ9EbX0MKnV1zPiHpI6ZSuV/xST0CKuJm0qsmgrW9UT1OxdPaT9YMzbw9cVbqjoFkK bavzQjPPbam1IrLJhdNGK6jy5zCmeeIpg/SyUwvkoUZGJKlMAAlRSbmA4pl2heLA0K3k Sxow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t21si12998899edw.597.2021.05.24.04.23.25; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232609AbhEXLWq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 May 2021 07:22:46 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5753 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232574AbhEXLWp (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 07:22:45 -0400 Received: from dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FpZSP3P7yzmkrx for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 19:17:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500014.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.153) by dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 24 May 2021 19:21:16 +0800 Received: from [10.174.179.184] (10.174.179.184) by dggpemm500014.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 24 May 2021 19:21:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 04/12] ss_add_info_dir: fix memory leak and check whether,NULL pointer From: Wu Guanghao To: CC: , References: <266bc52e-e279-ce84-0e1f-1405b9bc6174@huawei.com> Message-ID: <94591388-2107-6943-8988-5cd3a6371236@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 19:21:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <266bc52e-e279-ce84-0e1f-1405b9bc6174@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.179.184] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500014.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.153) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org In ss_add_info_dir(), need free info->info_dirs before return, otherwise it will cause memory leak. At the same time, it is necessary to check whether dirs[n_dirs] is a null pointer, otherwise a segmentation fault will occur. Signed-off-by: Wu Guanghao Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu Reviewed-by: Wu Bo --- lib/ss/help.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/ss/help.c b/lib/ss/help.c index 5204401b..429f410e 100644 --- a/lib/ss/help.c +++ b/lib/ss/help.c @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ void ss_add_info_dir(int sci_idx, char *info_dir, int *code_ptr) dirs = (char **)realloc((char *)dirs, (unsigned)(n_dirs + 2)*sizeof(char *)); if (dirs == (char **)NULL) { + free(info->info_dirs); info->info_dirs = (char **)NULL; *code_ptr = errno; return; @@ -155,6 +156,10 @@ void ss_add_info_dir(int sci_idx, char *info_dir, int *code_ptr) info->info_dirs = dirs; dirs[n_dirs + 1] = (char *)NULL; dirs[n_dirs] = malloc((unsigned)strlen(info_dir)+1); + if (dirs[n_dirs] = (char *)NULL) { + *code_ptr = errno; + return; + } strcpy(dirs[n_dirs], info_dir); *code_ptr = 0; } --