Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4036263pxj; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:11:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6UnqxXlS+eydfdMokbnV9zHZZ/KGTGkbhOp60EXZWrge3V1VtVmwLps++CbJqHcpE7jaY X-Received: by 2002:a92:b01:: with SMTP id b1mr15245796ilf.307.1621919500914; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:11:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621919500; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=imgAsEZObjzjVUNGzzSHMjT0jdn2IjlFoG99gBwRaenR9+DNyJB22utEOiZor6Ce6v RQKCtplMkX3NVuEk79Sz8Yy7Bjw1chzYY/s6UW8KTU/3Yaa5PssOR1zFzrO+faZA1LsW 4fLeie4ETbfqvg1vpiJBrTvekUY6gwDh5nU6G+NqeGRvHfLtd66ZyFziqjDAeTwT3lBk OXnXeQv/JVb7WpKXYKhhnvBuIvjq3iRtiM0bf/7vX+7hlV8bzJUTG+tSb9XFJwNix5E7 OokG4UvN715f09N60fMD0TMYMn9F7Z1S6H4onnX+hb7/ndhjnSHJuy1/s+3eq4XwslUm i4RA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Eb7bQQUEft/Wjyg3gjcZ6KFSxs3l21/AcHNdMKpY2sc=; b=uMOAVrs92aT2jePvUNAEzQ8RVoCMnNcS7ERUj/Vpr4wwIQLl+pMJpeGEtp9hXMWdo5 uGTdHlOSYrQ0abBULiTuqE7kGIIe70g1GkMBq5XTeUhMmzgvgT88PysN8RYOqmCe5Nq2 RVRn47mmYItJy3tFvLbg3QpVqydBZrbS+dBo4bpmRs5mAwsauqMUE5fzoQ6RT5v+g8AH yMdHr0Un5lpoj9YNTmAI23IpepLDYBuPYZ2XJadKlR5RYm/NLNbNZQC1HQ9s0wNFM1iv LUDqdPxIvYVuNQR+tZGiAZdgcU0sqRfywKcerycXdwy26uLLH5X71MhZ0Zxnd6QnPQ7Y pP/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=Ymf6gC5m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z89si16935806jah.125.2021.05.24.22.11.24; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=Ymf6gC5m; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229476AbhEYFDH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 May 2021 01:03:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59534 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230041AbhEYFDG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 01:03:06 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F865C061574; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:01:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Eb7bQQUEft/Wjyg3gjcZ6KFSxs3l21/AcHNdMKpY2sc=; b=Ymf6gC5mmvc9AQebvhRkJHBy1l 4DSm7zYm7/UILpLKDq8sENTtemjWG0wmRRjZKAlcJN8cUn7eACq9EXltP3M6mn/nzGWJSGQGLWs13 Lce2evxqEhHFs7SjDh4PaLS2yBKz5kYz1TX2RqAFdmlOqx19kj/qW15kl/GbQKYhdfV1s87lZJkEw DWlkUVnDN5j1itZ8PhPlN3Ftaat6Lf+gwMkLDBWf6xFQ2S+LIa9+QyOfM9JXZX/GuHXYHbURg4hr+ vMqdfKhOwK51ndgqvY68nUcm/qodARrjqQHoxwtYhT3qSihLI9mfQsyfEHXrnk1B4PBcJdLSQblV4 2jvEtpBA==; Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1llPBb-0038Z5-A5; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:01:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 06:00:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Josh Triplett , Andreas Dilger , David Howells , Theodore Ts'o , Chris Mason , Ext4 Developers List , xfs , linux-btrfs , linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel , NeilBrown Subject: Re: How capacious and well-indexed are ext4, xfs and btrfs directories? Message-ID: References: <206078.1621264018@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <6E4DE257-4220-4B5B-B3D0-B67C7BC69BB5@dilger.ca> <20210525042136.GA202068@locust> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210525042136.GA202068@locust> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:21:36PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Synchronous discard is slow, even on NVME. That really depends on the device. Some are specifically optimized for that workload due to customer requirements.