Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2301668pxj; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:30:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjrQEdWO5J+ti3XfwGnHhsbNGmIrlvjxMJAcwZdon/FOD9C6cNhGIgBwfQaO0UmAB5vJC6 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9343:: with SMTP id i3mr15883549ioo.77.1622435442904; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:30:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622435442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dxv5eeal79l8r+FmcxPEQdZn+mBV1TYf7FEy85pjZdziJNCXsK+vwE1bcmdiQchcVr CSZPnWOP1wdcC4LkdjqPKaylrRpTpzMe1VFzTLc6qyoc0QiX/oqwfMWj5F/sMYXmRTJ8 1mhn8TWeCFEbSWmJfDWvNgqv3FM6BgMR22nPg8qXqszMXjUHkdT7wJtKNznGlIWyEmY0 crxCwYagqymG0B0ey9gxcCwMcqI5dBCAFnCEvXH2MqDcMk372KBwfKCwQgTNlUENSQjT VUoKSyzpZQbWMQk9I6RNJ70xj+CGO3wahESdt7s53j9TkFsyR9OUKwQtCxpsPI/VPTTq NMTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=DqrOTPUnHHWS0m46now5LZ+CbN+Lk1IxMhjfv2p1/RY=; b=fOrmaJr3Ai+3nxmImR/G00/YuybjGDFga2fISTtfoSAPd/eZeM3Vd7QHTn34d8LXfL ygOH4FsGlr4mQKTzhxqUQ6SXnuSu0ZcSp3d6BF3A0nE5UoVusWWloJPDwKYT8vbmWxNv ZncWKfoavcfy3ukFS644hCWS9u4GJSyL/oIvGIhNmti3woVOtsPUJ1hOsTmoOjHyW/xu cfsiPUATpT8Vpv+PrMDqxKq5PrZFO+er7XWb72zPwt+scmAh1+LWx8trZzwe7Sd+e4wm Xj3pwFUqi5QKoWKdHgdYOqUDzo0MsypPS/ekpMLYCZaD2qMdzzcQoJIUE3J/GysPp74p Qi2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si12396504ile.141.2021.05.30.21.30.24; Sun, 30 May 2021 21:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230102AbhEaEaj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:30:39 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:43212 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229687AbhEaEai (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:30:38 -0400 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 14V4Skwq011135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 31 May 2021 00:28:47 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 6E29815C3734; Mon, 31 May 2021 00:28:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 00:28:46 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Wu Guanghao Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?0JHQu9Cw0LPQvtC00LDRgNC10L3QutC+INCQ0YDRgtGR0Lw=?= , liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com, linfeilong@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/12] e2fsprogs: some bugfixs and some code cleanups Message-ID: References: <00ad4a90-8a40-24c1-98d9-eb5f0da42436@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00ad4a90-8a40-24c1-98d9-eb5f0da42436@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 09:23:49AM +0800, Wu Guanghao wrote: > V1 -> V2: > > [PATCH V2 03/12] zap_sector: fix memory leak > free and return operators placed in {} block > > [PATCH V2 04/12] ss_add_info_dir: fix memory leak and check whether,NULL pointer > modified "=" to "==" > > [PATCH V2 06/12] append_pathname: check the value returned by realloc to avoid segfault > [PATCH V2 07/12] argv_parse: check return value of malloc in argv_parse() > Fix typos > > [PATCH V2 10/12] hashmap: change return value type of, ext2fs_hashmap_add() > remove "new_block = NULL;" Did you only send the patches that you changed, and didn't resend the patches that didn't change between V1 and V2? It's actually better if you resend the whole series in the future. Thanks, - Ted