Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@gmail.com>
To:     tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ext4: remove conflict comment from __ext4_forget
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:58:46 +0800
Message-Id: <20210623085846.1059647-1-jgq516@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@kylinos.cn>

We do a bforget and return for no journal case, so let's remove this
conflict comment.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@kylinos.cn>
---
Not sure if my understanding is correct, so this is RFC.

Thanks,
Guoqing

 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
index be799040a415..6e224b19eae7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
@@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ int __ext4_journal_get_write_access(const char *where, unsigned int line,
  * "bh" may be NULL: a metadata block may have been freed from memory
  * but there may still be a record of it in the journal, and that record
  * still needs to be revoked.
- *
- * If the handle isn't valid we're not journaling, but we still need to
- * call into ext4_journal_revoke() to put the buffer head.
  */
 int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle,
 		  int is_metadata, struct inode *inode,
-- 
2.25.1