Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp323229pxv; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzz2BIHaOVbf16t94PxnsGG1EZkNn+51BoU6lvvpw5R4oWVkNz77QGGNDjtHwqRYELE7A+K X-Received: by 2002:a5e:dd03:: with SMTP id t3mr7924226iop.97.1625059886986; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:31:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625059886; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y+WYkXt9lL4UmmxZaiVlyPNs+eXL/yPYet024t9cuEPrvrA+DWAnBkjXLPrNqcEW8J 0Nm16S6LY8USmB6QZpIPBro88hT7BLv4J/CDlX4/HBKUNc2mQp00qJIXv5t6WwTby2UG todO3xb5vPohXzo4hu10uB2TCy2wnYqTfuQK/ydd22iwSDXljmGtHbvE0v7iOtegpT9L IOmECauBnrZM/KOm1BS02jKUcUAMOMB0rlPVQlwMecEfaZztR/+bzMkXaQTA93a5QTt8 9hh0PAx33gAkwJR7HFsTHjllmosqjydlOJgiNvzQSP9KM6KZa4h7Qgj2HR65TDJ/lKqb Ec8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=XaVUdpleEbTVL60NonNBZc+MKpX2ZGVuagZc2BUq4xk=; b=Tim4JbVi4KIb7B0iKsL2WZorPMM5q+y/v9ClHyfqJNZ2448WSZ9K3TeZJr3BSR7w9y LO8DPG3byFE3+0thivps+z7ElG1cfnonX9bkvzj82JqTCXElPJek2NhbsQrE1UP4/zhE BcVtIskLtddrwzHG478uufQ8y3ykYNp8x9JCHys7XyPntvjOMN3W6f/iHCGTXvvuOPhG YJ/3uDcyXgVfgNACIj6vLVRljbW1M7tD0up+PxZ5+ODLktLKsVAG8Fx9gxHZBs+CaDQg ZIX2fCz1zgWwvnKIawc5hUGEHl28qO8rxLGJEapWfy1tnVschALGhnbJQxP+gFPexdKg uxEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=rVnfyrms; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u15si11146818iot.89.2021.06.30.06.31.09; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=rVnfyrms; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235190AbhF3NdS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:33:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:52992 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234768AbhF3NdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:33:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 15UD3oDg080522; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:30:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=XaVUdpleEbTVL60NonNBZc+MKpX2ZGVuagZc2BUq4xk=; b=rVnfyrmsjitWOPILAigdYpfdP9ftFnY3rdY1t0paBU2h2csXC1Ig1I72lawkq2hnFLzZ /8UkXcv2CTPThNKMY7gBOi+tG1l2w/vxpp8E0vbNUlsiCV2mbAfvr30unC9jXYivHx84 FlRtMfSPUdJ0Pe/fGs6HyQ/tNSpR29u5hNVAIfROsyZxJa+L3KA5vO6UKi1Hyblx2Iyx h7NAemWjiHul++2IsFms34T/0TQkLZqiHvZk4SFNZrReGa38WtR2PPsQ9dnGrl/yqgSJ R4cwPO59UR1ciMbZj38LKZcZXSuGvnNzQ/Q3+mX2A4Gc2rU7xgsbcOeKnAYocqrnRWLe Ug== Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39gqkhv2xj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:30:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 15UDNfIJ023886; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:39 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 39duv8gxna-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:39 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 15UDUbqo33095966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:37 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DABA405F; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F693A4067; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.85.89.133]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:30:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:00:35 +0530 From: Ritesh Harjani To: fstests@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] 64K blocksize related fixes Message-ID: <20210630133035.yzqslqcobgkvfvn3@riteshh-domain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: FH8covjouWMgnmdlVYhINZduElu0Q5-N X-Proofpoint-GUID: FH8covjouWMgnmdlVYhINZduElu0Q5-N X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-06-30_05:2021-06-29,2021-06-30 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2106300079 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 21/06/14 11:58AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Below are the list of fixes mostly centered around 64K blocksize (on PPC64) > and with ext4 filesystem. Tested this with both 64K & 4K blocksize on Power > with (ext4/ext3/ext2/xfs/btrfs). Gentle reminder on this patch series. -ritesh > > Ritesh Harjani (9): > ext4/003: Fix this test on 64K platform for dax config > ext4/027: Correct the right code of block and inode bitmap > ext4/306: Add -b blocksize parameter too to avoid failure with DAX config > ext4/022: exclude this test for dax config on 64KB pagesize platform > generic/031: Fix the test case for 64k blocksize config > gitignore: Add 031.out file to .gitignore > generic/620: Remove -b blocksize option for ext4 > common/attr: Cleanup end of line whitespaces issues > common/attr: Reduce MAX_ATTRS to leave some overhead for 64K blocksize > > .gitignore | 1 + > common/attr | 20 ++++++------ > tests/ext4/003 | 3 +- > tests/ext4/022 | 7 ++-- > tests/ext4/027 | 4 +-- > tests/ext4/306 | 5 ++- > tests/generic/031 | 37 ++++++++++++++++++---- > tests/generic/031.out.64k | 19 +++++++++++ > tests/generic/{031.out => 031.out.default} | 0 > tests/generic/620 | 7 ++++ > 10 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tests/generic/031.out.64k > rename tests/generic/{031.out => 031.out.default} (100%) > > -- > 2.31.1 >