Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp490605pxv; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyk9yvUObkLVTPwbkxlx/yfQr2FLjpTe4xVInrOGdRDxyWbzIw7hqf6R2mHN6Q3lY5EvBWu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1a38:: with SMTP id be24mr48696293edb.243.1625072898327; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625072898; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OHtCHL9ux1cuyjm49sw/CqZ1EIEOeDUGNpk2onXoLcYtTyXesTgSTL4cDuONg88Kyw mHT/5ts0aGWgg9kXAeL1j+V5hrUqhS8Cp/JSh/bsOUg9jji38TaotfFs2mA6KarYOSef rNMFR7YJlQZsfLWk0ACbqZ11GfVATt4ivTpSEk3NsYWQWaA1vxSWEuxE+NNy8F8KrV0u bYYu3IrufuWFFMyb7YN7FpHh9TCLan4D0VpxmJBkHOlvGkBo/f/rVqyku4HCW2kLG4K0 U0ao7Uz7WPxNRyUIPpWIWPd3sZlGv9Bb6lFxOA3KHcBzmfow3YR3geG0pNozaBMyCqTa QpCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=77mOWHTY2cFZHVBTGR8PGWWRAlrkb2qxfPzE8YfWTpw=; b=EQQuNAO+11QwbFJb+In9hOKauYP7p/T1yPtEt6TVhaFiLKx41eRIW1hU6TNMVLoVxH VZURAAV0cDibfls/NBGKUlB6dZd2hBtpZ4eGqG01hKJA3jfNzAMO7aM6ywVe9Ra1WulH vooOc04XC1grFi+Ontq7NNtY2m2PROsh/yxQwG8Y1KiYuFRoxCwmcO6E6timKYhwH+KA uLELyh3BkQ2ada8gychofFI6guNi2hmt7//jPwQzu0HQydl6RepP8MVM/yATnGLqbXGq c278vE3bfSLOxFBysRvmjJZ8KjywnR/85QVVKQeRLyPRZ6EmaG3LWB4dTBvraiyGRMk2 8RXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k9si22785704edv.565.2021.06.30.10.07.42; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232373AbhF3RJm (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:09:42 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:40563 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232278AbhF3RJm (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:09:42 -0400 Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 15UH773G019551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:07:08 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 91D5315C3C8E; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:07:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:07:07 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Ritesh Harjani Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] generic/620: Remove -b blocksize option for ext4 Message-ID: References: <8b3d5afe83ee6d1d35f57914a9b0cfa4b5bb4361.1623651783.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b3d5afe83ee6d1d35f57914a9b0cfa4b5bb4361.1623651783.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:58:11AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > ext4 with 64k blocksize fails with below error for this given test which > requires dmhugedisk. Also since dax is not supported for this test, so > make sure to remove -b option, if set by config file for ext4 FSTYP for > the test to then use 4K blocksize by default. > > mkfs.ext4: Input/output error while writing out and closing file system > > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani Looking at this test, I'm not convinced it actually does the right thing when the block size is 64k, since the whole point is to test what happens when the block number > INT_MAX. So we should be able to fix the block size to be 1k, which would allow us to use a smaller dmhugedisk, and then skip this test if dax is enabled. OTOH, generic/620 runs pretty quicky, so perhaps it's better to do thie quick fix: hardcode the block size to 4k, and then skip it if dax && page_size != 4k. - Ted