Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3317750pxv; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKcipp0AEDq784gnAOm0mVAqGGw7ECw3xr/coGr4gYO+oJXqBwkBOYCd5zMnfEMMK5ZPXi X-Received: by 2002:a92:8747:: with SMTP id d7mr15522254ilm.173.1626659287507; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626659287; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vx3JfKIPP02Cf3rOG+YzTVskSBMStuK9Bz9oX6mZ5gbQXqPG33l2IAUglb41ikSEw3 uf9/CUTU8P9CwIJnhWb260s6wtPNY0byzHNv/D/N+bNJLH2MoV/yweTYDkEWhgbCN3yK aaT7KLKewZGzgAAU+0Tl6p/zneldfJIAKLKBjaCL/NFjd4lGtKimJB1vt9Nc7ca9FJ// YQybuZr62/2eCwLAtC7xlR1bQT6I8emMPxqo5Taj+O2IIxCwS7T02zOl9FrqQ4RQwITs qnOAJWcQIiQbGhrGQNd4jHmxLwHOULHsimF3+rDW2XZ0jCO1zA+z9bjuzVDkadludD33 5mSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=juA6TbypdsVcLucVsXBPZtfKssofzVRad3Qi0rTLHVk=; b=Iuev1ll5Qk8cm4TQsIfP3JOzC2sMlTXSxvFPxL9Zx21wFqOtxzFVuBuX3xLM8EjyMi sLwzyKOp/XgzNnk/iXEiAsTUIywTKmfTdGMFeBLelUB8DcNAxxccxL7DEKLjIkHUlPwa s1h6DKUJ/FPvaMQCcWn2wKMI5eA0Owc5Z9KI6AP5qsx2FFnvqICRC+C3o3KgiTFK7Cgs O/dcjlTEx2YHF2OiCgMDxJoJIlLxd32najwDp8UKoHCF5a/S68ZknwAHh6nagd/9D0tf BB0UWIk9ZsOMItiNEY/r9zqK7DmItHlLMx23m4/LO9M/9phstXIhHBFpohoWRcRfm2Hd hRWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h22si14339232jal.57.2021.07.18.18.47.48; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233759AbhGSBuq (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:50:46 -0400 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.36]:34589 "EHLO out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233713AbhGSBuq (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:50:46 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01424;MF=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UgAb0Iu_1626659265; Received: from admindeMacBook-Pro-2.local(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UgAb0Iu_1626659265) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 09:47:45 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: only allow SETFLAGS to set DAX flag on files and dirs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20210716061951.81529-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> <20210716162017.GA22346@magnolia> From: JeffleXu Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 09:47:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210716162017.GA22346@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 7/17/21 12:20 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 02:19:51PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote: >> This is similar to commit dbc77f31e58b ("vfs: only allow FSSETXATTR to >> set DAX flag on files and dirs"). >> >> Though the underlying filesystems may have filtered invalid flags, e.g., >> ext4_mask_flags() called in ext4_fileattr_set(), also check it in VFS >> layer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu >> --- >> fs/ioctl.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c >> index 1e2204fa9963..1fe73e148e2d 100644 >> --- a/fs/ioctl.c >> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c >> @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int fileattr_set_prepare(struct inode *inode, >> * It is only valid to set the DAX flag on regular files and >> * directories on filesystems. >> */ >> - if ((fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) && >> + if ((fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX || fa->flags & FS_DAX_FL) && > > I thought we always had to surround flag tests with separate > parentheses...? Thanks. The 'bitwise and' has a higher priority than 'logical or'. But for sure I can add parentheses to make it more readable and precise. -- Thanks, Jeffle