Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5183593pxv; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:28:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzz3TDs3UcvCByJbJM52GeJgraYmaZzFtW6xru0W9ZAHRYAy1Yd7a3giw18fwgEU1IlguGI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:b24:: with SMTP id e4mr22723762ilu.41.1626845325654; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:28:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626845325; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BeOfN3oaQDqekoTmdQj2a6ZP8txtsvuEKli5r9mQzB0Ovew/JhnTs+kGEbdTfIaxpW QLKkiMtCB8bqjKEjb0B7l2NDD6wedhuQ2Pa22pxMJWaWVo5rQ7K4Z3PwLilcZ0SQmJnJ pjfjzE16FkfvHZjNSUm6hpl23RlgjhjtVZXp0q9dugbx6Vu01n0ygEh5aeWxgdAsxkrO GZBmN/aS/jMxu2Bj3DDihSSz41G3pXDpQ0fHl9XglzSHa5pC8cPjAb9vO8VCvEQiH/aa W7NPYoFEhVwsBstrGcFxMrJcVVohHaRSA6WEKZA/pe7iD1/dBfXDLinFDB1pjIE097mi YY+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=NICI5Rv7QYHw0dLqmtiHhsDwLuJNAn+1FJatrDjVSU0=; b=CNZP8RbCCvmX4m2GPlgAdE77gclAZ/ldDMsi9wQTm7Tiyo2JyPFyMT0zcwZRXoWEtr L+H1A/HEu8RtfVFhlpoNo6WfoXiAfSdupJavxkV0Ee7S4L8QVkGu6/jmC/2P3nEc8WPN i2Gh7FNtVYlTQrzjr7xQGBK2zkjyVG0KkEcYhrr/hb9O/6iV/QbqBijm+jcjY7XK+ZYO wrvcZWAPjAjXfCDBtBpWCOyg7Q8bmDpeOf1fhi9CESxajP2w3b19AkfKyiv3rrSeBQoD wK+2EoXvltQHJ1xGXXkLVQ++rhlEYmNcne5Xjb0gdIY1F/d00bLIKwmVB/Gw+cC7OZ6M tSPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=qFbL+FrI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x14si26273753jab.2.2021.07.20.22.28.27; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=qFbL+FrI; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229484AbhGUErf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:47:35 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:65032 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229450AbhGUEre (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:47:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 16L542F8028548; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:28:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=NICI5Rv7QYHw0dLqmtiHhsDwLuJNAn+1FJatrDjVSU0=; b=qFbL+FrIrowOE1Cg70OgHnRQmWS+ALZSQtC4OI9ryYpfRTUiBD7AaGYRhwbK1P5Na4uZ Q+mvSbs1eI+BbA7FgqSm/Ux3l/8NONGe9OJiqTnxFIgio1vfl1YxK5pxiBJWHgCS1xbp PIv6hU4q/NIH4Gjq104SP1PhFL8Uter8R/98DBO/T7ExcLYEiCheY8tdVzyx6Ftx7OFA wMtBxv85PC+8mBWJ6u4J54CGpBqByk4MbTtQ4FKswHA89idSwIv2J8TNaQ0O8xVWlcjD xVgOt72/Rp5pKiYHjDfUAjBXVobFgFA21LiWLQZeKTiwNpwPn6PfROQAcaHuEIhLTzIx 0w== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39xb4ttuq2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:28:08 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 16L5DEii027484; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:07 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 39upfh90d4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:07 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 16L5S49S28049774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:04 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B791DAE057; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FC7AE056; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.85.82.121]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:28:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: fstests@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , "Darrick J . Wong" , Ritesh Harjani Subject: [PATCHv2 0/9] xfstests: 64K blocksize related fixes Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:57:53 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: wwJwGX9k4Xgn7Uoebcu0BkbE4vrqPd59 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: wwJwGX9k4Xgn7Uoebcu0BkbE4vrqPd59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-21_02:2021-07-21,2021-07-21 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2107210025 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Hello, Below are the list of fixes mostly centered around 64K blocksize and with ext4 filesystem. Tested this with both 64K & 4K blocksize on Power with (ext4/ext3/ext2/xfs/btrfs). v1 -> v2 1. Address comments from Ted and Darrick mentioned at [1] [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/12318137 Ritesh Harjani (9): ext4/003: Fix this test on 64K platform for dax config ext4/027: Correct the right code of block and inode bitmap ext4/306: Add -b blocksize parameter too to avoid failure with DAX config ext4/022: exclude this test for dax config on 64KB pagesize platform generic/031: Fix the test case for 64k blocksize config common/rc: Add _mkfs_dev_blocksized functionality generic/620: Use _mkfs_dev_blocksized to use 4k bs common/attr: Cleanup end of line whitespaces issues common/attr: Reduce MAX_ATTRS to leave some overhead for 64K blocksize common/attr | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- common/rc | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/ext4/003 | 3 ++- tests/ext4/022 | 7 ++++-- tests/ext4/027 | 4 +-- tests/ext4/306 | 5 +++- tests/generic/031 | 14 +++++++---- tests/generic/031.out | 16 ++++++------ tests/generic/620 | 4 ++- 9 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1