Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:19:22 +1000
From:   Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc:     krisman@collabora.com, pvorel@suse.cz,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
        LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in
 FAN_FS_ERROR
Message-ID: <YSOEOj7xUpADB73f@google.com>
References: <20210802214645.2633028-1-krisman@collabora.com>
 <20210802214645.2633028-4-krisman@collabora.com>
 <CAOQ4uxjMfJM4FM4tWJWgjbK4a2K1hNJdEBRvwQTh9+5su2N0Tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87fsvphksu.fsf@collabora.com>
 <CAOQ4uxj_WwDPxZv0nr9+Hh+pim6+2onaBdFq_BR-qK=xz+8yUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YR+CH2+GYzwU2/SG@pevik>
 <YSAlb7XGUNoc73ZJ@google.com>
 <20210823093524.GB21467@quack2.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210823093524.GB21467@quack2.suse.cz>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 21-08-21 07:58:07, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > > No problem. That's what review is for ;-)
> > > 
> > > > BTW, unless anyone is specifically interested I don't think there
> > > > is a reason to re post the test patches before the submission request.
> > > > Certainly not for the small fixes that I requested.
> > > 
> > > > I do request that you post a link to a branch with the fixed test
> > > > so that we can experiment with the kernel patches.
> > > 
> > > > I've also CC'ed Matthew who may want to help with review of the test
> > > > and man page that you posted in the cover letter [1].
> > > 
> > > @Amir Thanks a lot for your review, agree with all you mentioned.
> > > 
> > > @Gabriel Thanks for your contribution. I'd also consider squashing some of the
> > > commits.
> > 
> > Is the FAN_FS_ERROR feature to be included within the 5.15 release? If so,
> > I may need to do some shuffling around as these LTP tests collide with the
> > ones I author for the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series.
> 
> No, I don't think FAN_FS_ERROR is quite ready for the coming merge window.
> So you should be fine.

Alrighty, thanks for letting me know Jan.

/M