Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp2186710pxb; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:11:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxobnOUlTgV8gfKwBRUnsLQeh5xtdXocHNxEVsr0Up/BRMiySHV6qm65gMMWWGqmVtqEIBl X-Received: by 2002:a02:2a88:: with SMTP id w130mr31295564jaw.60.1629753093675; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:11:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629753093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wiw8pMzI7i2qzmEM3DaZI9JHSJ5qKdeQP0y9/0cVsc/oe54Jv0l/MdQ5MRBOQcEYs3 7dtc3gL+OjkfyZl/cxk83PXAPS4v2tJMQXkDY3Nr7ejHhqdLNAHDeUok3g0TuWOgKyGr RiWuoOL47+3tp5FVXt2ZgMj/tt2fziikq4yoHdWtCLe9sFTh+1V/+kzGvTji7LhRj1Pw ccERxJ6rq2WmXSgjfRrFy77l51AD2c7lZWbhPW75kRLhvthWOclgQFjS/zwtARVIxQuQ Otd8ot4PDKh3JjffON4AR5esKv4WXoPXW923Uojgu1C0G7590+JcsTBa4xKe89Fk4hQi DS3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=kERAiQoYaUiZLUwWrv4bOyfnlzgpfin7j02w+F9IvyI=; b=Re2MZZlWmp5FE4c0GLoIA1IMOuANYUUHad6OuSjdR8jZ3cKYcPnt6EEGIIjx9MjG1s Tu4kIWkci78E8CcQH1KBdJDfK7srAs1uv6mkiUVMVjafrjL6AiV0nusmSbTRtP+67+po sSEM2H/9QJ5ep/uUizlaf0gPh5neLE5OUjbDKw7qyt6OS85smOlZISHUOHXlQdqNSLiV greiCLvbc+QmBFJBbMtpOYsGRSmk0aFHFtLRtgmiw11e+277D9cRkKYPOzFKYstwEwGm pmePqf7EnBZ5Nc7Pi9fBZIxN9HJp9j67703Uql34sLok+Yi/MwbwIHUvCvD461qi7N2P LSWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=lt4AXvvt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f18si889240jat.62.2021.08.23.14.11.18; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=lt4AXvvt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232739AbhHWVLG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:11:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38348 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232644AbhHWVLF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:11:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631B3C061757 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id w8so17810434pgf.5 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kERAiQoYaUiZLUwWrv4bOyfnlzgpfin7j02w+F9IvyI=; b=lt4AXvvtTufuHda/bGjNiZxhwiAm/AnyRlhljPx5+BrAEe34p23FhAtHB3HYEPECjI jZJJBRria/KJ2mzQ9LOwyzbCZoSDaOdQR0S9CRFr6soYOqwb/+FUoQUrKf/mlQY4M/No ndC3I1GeQjlJMJ/jw/JblYnAZq44iy2TYPyqnbJDRkcgjClk3LC8P4WfyaypwNTJEmKy RnigTJKYP/gKvnicdNOGQq68auU7dv4psI4APDrepknd32ykDnbq7z6T5MQJv19mjiWP +i8XIcGhUKXqKHEMe1QF0XZeeTc5nlVkb6dsFL2GNpG0DZg+xXbWpj/FUtsMz52eKKbN kD+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kERAiQoYaUiZLUwWrv4bOyfnlzgpfin7j02w+F9IvyI=; b=g9VwmEoQnZ5A0cpMqQl1Qh/Qy59DwJj8kAM2mysMiclfNlK6GGUKvAg2MrdEQGvdER rMSBI1tVVAwJ0HkeTqSref6UqzI509bAceeBvEfiMyc/ni8ChGmkO2ux8Pzxg0i3dZ7E +prL81qngrLVzSPTuC/8Zs40bpEmOq6XZ8Xa1qoq3v5ilkAZNGurYTAEisNg8WoK24kG vzo2g7q+VCPOCrESxaLBDpHPhLIFVD5UfIJaJOg9AlpPXM9mdUEb1IIUplsdtuVg/KdK M2GdEJeiqTLpzLzYZboTHeKjpl3BM+DS0hRESS8WDtnL2yDispnZfFhZ4BtstXlB1lb9 gpLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JmKaCIS3tOs7XXRVD0dMj6/1EoEhrZU3RK+Yeik6tDSAyy0Gr wLnDJqZ9JJLWir1bdbto7599dZpS9jPvmMULesRYAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6642:: with SMTP id z2mr21533804pgv.240.1629753021975; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:10:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210823123516.969486-1-hch@lst.de> <20210823123516.969486-7-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20210823123516.969486-7-hch@lst.de> From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:10:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dax: remove __generic_fsdax_supported To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Mike Snitzer , Matthew Wilcox , linux-xfs , Linux NVDIMM , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Just implement generic_fsdax_supported directly out of line instead of > adding a wrapper. Given that generic_fsdax_supported is only supplied > for CONFIG_FS_DAX builds this also allows to not provide it at all for > !CONFIG_FS_DAX builds. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Dan Williams