Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1069083pxb; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:06:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVVTSuN7eSLL0grXrCoTftyqm4M97mQA9mTOCrcbknKXxHs3b18RWus6yR07aCZm3D+7rK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2599:: with SMTP id m25mr42966293ejb.302.1634699161889; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:06:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634699161; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TuT2B+YR7iJEMIaMX4bhopkkBYfKWqMvs15lTroDAYdq1c6G5Poh6b4VjmvIGy8wUR Uhh47IYUdbbWys6L/dHS1ly8JF0xquEy8aMyoRUkqb5sapNA6Avbe/A6RexbrDRmDweU Rt/WYFCFrNWkIm1Tl6m2N9K64Pw42WKzl4tqKI32pL9jFR+wsWfRVyBkSftOu1PgyHza XwwuJ6MYrBZ+Mr+kOURCXL4G4AfwCTWoOQQEd3MqOJMPj+1Z2I9hnBXVcmD2I+yagAib NSMdOH7mA1A+3/AUXGQxxmBVTWlbqXZFIlxZsO+f4Nczu8WcNVuHV5p1UtlQL6Z56bjz sr2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=nTsmJ7aHD1xFl154I5UFDWHYvSlqQ1WmWRp9xePfXTY=; b=ZnumD+m6CSwzOyh3qAjmsrb+ssHhHUzEb6gPrBcUJtpMwZVg0zASvi3nv+PL3nWTaY AWMs3DNXmsKpyntTtjyARRkFUbArt+Oa1fzaBIJlLaTySUBYx1XxvrlBazNXrvPgwCJT 62bm3FnEZBVCXBvnkHTg2ROcwzF2Y8LchwS2+YN5QxgaHzJr90aMVF6MCQXURQWba7VF abPrkq2wen3onIRfP0dc6g2qYy7JVuY+V0pO6gixS2pcFQ8vqN1YXTU7X7pvBJG9QbSw 7JOiGHIQIsDjGzhwFmak2Zou7Mi9fxb5j48m+1lwQcPMaL+CJ1IY0+hH/Ag8/AR2GlVp WGkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si875955edz.509.2021.10.19.20.05.35; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229691AbhJTDHp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:07:45 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:25298 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229555AbhJTDHo (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:07:44 -0400 Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HYwNR3CQVzbglk; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:00:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:05:28 +0800 From: Ye Bin To: , , CC: , , Ye Bin Subject: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] Fix some issues about mmp Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20211020031802.2312022-1-yebin10@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org I test mmp function as follow steps: 1. Inject delay 5s in ext4_multi_mount_protect function after "skip:" label. 2. Share HostA block device(sda) with HostB(nbd0) by NBD. 3. Enable mmp feature when mkfs.ext4 sda. 4. Mount sda and nbd0 at the same time. I found kmmpd never trigger detect multi-mount. Reason is as follow: 1. Kmmpd init seq with 0, if two host have same nodename, will lead to detect confliction very slow, even never detect confliction. 2. When detect confliction in kmmpd, we get 'check_bh' is same with 'bh'. so we compare data with itself. 3. We only trigger detect when ”diff > mmp_check_interval * HZ“, 'mmp_check_interval' is double of 'mmp_update_interval', 'diff' is about 'mmp_update_interval'. So 'diff' is little than 'mmp_check_interval * HZ' normaly. As Jan Kara explain as follows: "I think the check is there only for the case where write_mmp_block() + sleep took longer than mmp_check_interval. I agree that should rarely happen but on a really busy system it is possible and in that case we would miss updating mmp block for too long and so another node could have started using the filesystem. " v1->v2: Fix 'last_check_time' not initialized before checking. v2->v3: 1. drop commit "ext4: introduce last_check_time record previous check time" As Ted explain as follows: "I'd like Andreas to comment here. My understanding is that MMP originally intended as a safety mechanism which would be used as part of a primary/backup high availability system, but not as the *primary* system where you might try to have two servers simultaneously try to mount the file system and use MMP as the "election" mechanism to decide which server is going to be the primary system, and which would be the backup system. The cost of being able to handle this particular race is it would slow down the mounts of cleanly unmounted systems. There *are* better systems to implement leader elections[1] than using MMP. Most of these more efficient leader elections assume that you have a working IP network, and so if you have a separate storage network (including a shared SCSI bus) from your standard IP network, then MMP is a useful failsafe in the face of a network partition of your IP network. The question is whether MMP should be useful for more than that. And if it isn't, then we should probably document what MMP is and isn't good for, and give advice in the form of an application note for how MMP should be used in the context of a larger system." 2. drop commit "ext4: fix possible store wrong check interval value in disk when umount" 3. simplify read_mmp_block fucntion to avoid UAF v3->v4: 1. drop commit "ext4: init 'seq' with the value which set in 'ext4_multi_mount_protect'" 2. merge "ext4: get buffer head before read_mmp_block" to "ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion" 3. rename "ext4: avoid to re-read mmp check data get from page cache" to "ext4: remove useless bh_check variable" 4. reorder "ext4: remove useless bh_check variable" and "ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion" v4->v5: 1. Fix follow warning: >> fs/ext4/mmp.c:124:15: warning: variable 'mmp_block' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] ext4_fsblk_t mmp_block; 2. Fix incorrect judgement in 'ext4_multi_mount_protect'. Ye Bin (3): ext4: compare to local seq and nodename when check conflict ext4: remove useless bh_check variable ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion fs/ext4/ext4.h | 5 +++- fs/ext4/mmp.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1