Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1069733pxb; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNkRn28se1PSoCX2IIxRh3spfUoo4qrqGIfATqMAPSnClQY/8FEPkdWZ6b6HZxYMRz7QuS X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c22:: with SMTP id ga34mr40301293ejc.380.1634699235101; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634699235; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q2aTJAtf789uqWVUgb5M4VJZjqtdskTOOdmg6mABHqmiBZZocXp97vAKf46SrY0/v4 q02p72tGfOpbClMkA6G7kA2jG94XmgfUTg8+htYdbtAqJrVVX2DWPI4+H79TUFjPCies dpvndvb3F9JyLMbzWCsu2noLzxtYxMZNZqvdljs39BkFQgJeBbnT1+AwmByg60ZhiFtj OuRX+nvVWCVh+mFQ819QruYnKeOWf7f8UN88B923EELFmVbX3ttE+KQiJ6zPmLgx69t/ ppfGv2c1HwqBT8Xu1j4Wuq5lR0ABXlp/S1rWOJtO5Bucp/tdgSEHVnxOZe2Kapt/4Gz7 HZmA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=k3oec4ASGpBHUygVoNBxEoy8vAllHgfitSux71tKtPI=; b=kxmmfVqkux0EGA80zIL3UX6LUaF0LD1XIAHxooUmSQd7Ti++VrEBXj3D0HoerK3m15 iIxKQftsf/49+tvguIgCi70Wok5Hy4czpLMSDJcsW3QF8Bfjqf9XLhsO/louiuLsL7xk CHMHBsMOhRDeRTdmmF9JZtp7j7VQkYLEbnDLafKr4b+hpTLa/U2kThpkq2/jjILHASfL lsTDhywtaNoCXSK9skyPs0s/oN9gGrnbmJUKAAFx4bS/LVEAt28tWKHh1uDyBsYlhjof h1OQw+tjES3xXAuPzMNwyNxLh0leGZhu3/8DWH8Cxakc8BLoaLcHEYaQdZ5L3Q5F6Wf1 Gy7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ho18si1884909ejc.125.2021.10.19.20.06.51; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229555AbhJTDHr (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:07:47 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:14832 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229678AbhJTDHp (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:07:45 -0400 Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HYwN20g05z905l; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:00:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:05:29 +0800 From: Ye Bin To: , , CC: , , Ye Bin Subject: [PATCH -next v5 3/3] ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:18:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20211020031802.2312022-4-yebin10@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20211020031802.2312022-1-yebin10@huawei.com> References: <20211020031802.2312022-1-yebin10@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This patch is according to Jan Kara's suggestion: I guess I would just get rid of sb_getblk() in read_mmp_block() and always expect valid bh passed. The only place that passes NULL bh after this patch is one case in ext4_multi_mount_protect() and that can call sb_getblk() on its own. That way we can also simplify read_mmp_block() prototype to: static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh); Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mmp.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mmp.c b/fs/ext4/mmp.c index 9788c617e593..d46239a0e36b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mmp.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mmp.c @@ -64,33 +64,26 @@ static int write_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh) /* * Read the MMP block. It _must_ be read from disk and hence we clear the * uptodate flag on the buffer. + * Caller must ensure pass valid 'bh'. */ -static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bh, - ext4_fsblk_t mmp_block) +static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head *bh) { struct mmp_struct *mmp; int ret; - if (*bh) - clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); - - /* This would be sb_bread(sb, mmp_block), except we need to be sure - * that the MD RAID device cache has been bypassed, and that the read - * is not blocked in the elevator. */ - if (!*bh) { - *bh = sb_getblk(sb, mmp_block); - if (!*bh) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto warn_exit; - } + if (!bh) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto warn_exit; } - lock_buffer(*bh); - ret = ext4_read_bh(*bh, REQ_META | REQ_PRIO, NULL); + clear_buffer_uptodate(bh); + + lock_buffer(bh); + ret = ext4_read_bh(bh, REQ_META | REQ_PRIO, NULL); if (ret) goto warn_exit; - mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)((*bh)->b_data); + mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)((bh)->b_data); if (le32_to_cpu(mmp->mmp_magic) != EXT4_MMP_MAGIC) { ret = -EFSCORRUPTED; goto warn_exit; @@ -101,10 +94,7 @@ static int read_mmp_block(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bh, } return 0; warn_exit: - brelse(*bh); - *bh = NULL; - ext4_warning(sb, "Error %d while reading MMP block %llu", - ret, mmp_block); + ext4_warning(sb, "Error %d while reading MMP block", ret); return ret; } @@ -131,7 +121,6 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data) struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es; struct buffer_head *bh = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mmp_bh; struct mmp_struct *mmp; - ext4_fsblk_t mmp_block; u32 seq = 0; unsigned long failed_writes = 0; int mmp_update_interval = le16_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_update_interval); @@ -141,7 +130,6 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data) char nodename[EXT4_MMP_NODENAME_LEN]; int retval = 0; - mmp_block = le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block); mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh->b_data); mmp->mmp_time = cpu_to_le64(ktime_get_real_seconds()); /* @@ -195,7 +183,7 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data) */ diff = jiffies - last_update_time; if (diff > mmp_check_interval * HZ) { - retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block); + retval = read_mmp_block(sb, bh); if (retval) { ext4_error_err(sb, -retval, "error reading MMP data: %d", @@ -289,7 +277,11 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, goto failed; } - retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block); + bh = sb_getblk(sb, mmp_block); + if (!bh) + goto failed; + + retval = read_mmp_block(sb, bh); if (retval) goto failed; @@ -327,7 +319,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, goto failed; } - retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block); + retval = read_mmp_block(sb, bh); if (retval) goto failed; mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh->b_data); @@ -356,7 +348,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, goto failed; } - retval = read_mmp_block(sb, &bh, mmp_block); + retval = read_mmp_block(sb, bh); if (retval) goto failed; mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh->b_data); -- 2.31.1