Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1ADC433FE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 03:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240906AbhKXDzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:55:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236364AbhKXDzc (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:55:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8375C06173E for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id m24so736290pls.10 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6zOlc/LjY/38MNl2fNjkOvdM3xFlyfeXQW77bsVPs7U=; b=lAK1cPsbcZgDOnzv+wRyX5hFeuNtWn74alyzSOfh2WTiCK6b1Gd9bfDzl0+LSFYqBx NFA78tBSHfT8IWLc76OROAypo1vlQiiVSp+deqPBmSErFfOP18cWXFbnZCxI9VIMHHuR rkB6XFn/xh99StS9siD+gMovD+TGGHheUMxQDm6Fs4TRxLl6LVPgdXFahdYzrs2kgHk1 2vtAqiLmzKNsso+noEF/MbJXbTSUoUVvNEOcLZD7XraD8UxaJOkOnpqbEwEn6rei4bjJ t5MvTN9s/WuPOzLWfQKYxVJtbNdZgfs/23Dfq3WeRbXM/0WgTMF9HeylQ/9xSVmw3Fc5 g5XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6zOlc/LjY/38MNl2fNjkOvdM3xFlyfeXQW77bsVPs7U=; b=egY3y5nT1510KEF+cBMPHfLfOBzsNeNn9OJds6jHLoY8Fo33MoKYUzp5lQAd++n5Bu DaeDQQkFbgh7bVStvirzMRP1OowF9v/1UO8ECuWnz3pn7my2FgP9LVbiKYKMVpqep6G7 PbZGd3D68vac3bUQy6A4NWI+qqHuFXra13nv1LFXGNf32nbXpew/W6KhM4UhEF4D+AIh 54siVmkYCZYD6OMdZs9x5ynwKQzjB/dtV9CDcGcRAiy0qL/MVJ/+sOQAkqMvMP9cshVJ Ljawde1Fl0cVeWiRGuuPI5ubnCA9YMgM3bVjVLWJ3z6PTjQigR4KBvsVA075BLR7faT4 DJwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eOgr599nn+p9K223fYwsuTqh6fjJ388zquQ0ALmlPWc76by2W 6XWTpyUwD3JuW9SGKhlY6vU3Am3WplNdfVos8iL2Ag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymXNtj/xuoHYk/qKEwmz57TlRY6ykmrutCD2G8CDlG536bSV07F4JpqasRcpvkUcp5iE8OReW1Fq5UwnxXf/0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e7ca:: with SMTP id kb10mr10703847pjb.8.1637725942362; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211109083309.584081-1-hch@lst.de> <20211109083309.584081-30-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20211109083309.584081-30-hch@lst.de> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:52:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/29] fsdax: don't require CONFIG_BLOCK To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mike Snitzer , Ira Weiny , device-mapper development , linux-xfs , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-fsdevel , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4 , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:34 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The file system DAX code now does not require the block code. So allow > building a kernel with fuse DAX but not block layer. Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams