Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA00C433F5 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232478AbhLIWOj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:14:39 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:57831 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231334AbhLIWOi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:14:38 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (guestnat-104-133-8-106.corp.google.com [104.133.8.106] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1B9M9tbh002091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:09:56 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id DD76E4205DB; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:09:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:09:54 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Lukas Czerner Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ext4: new mount API conversion Message-ID: References: <20211027141857.33657-1-lczerner@redhat.com> <20211209195520.z7vv4jtvgpu4omxx@work> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211209195520.z7vv4jtvgpu4omxx@work> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 08:55:20PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > > Should I use the v4 patch set or do you have a newer set of changes > > that you'd like me to use? There was a minor patch conflict in patch > > #2, but that was pretty simple to fix up. > > I don't have anything newer than this. I could rebase it if you'd like > me to, but it sounds like you've already done that pretty easily? Yep, I've done that and have run tests against it (including ext4/053 to test ext2/3/4 mount options). I just haven't pushed it out pending your confirmation that the v4 patchset was the one I should use. Thanks! - Ted