Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:13:38 +0100
From:   Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To:     Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
        Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
        LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event
Message-ID: <Yfqtsi5Y0u8Sv2P8@yuki>
References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com>
 <YdxN6HBJF+ATgZxP@pevik>
 <CAOQ4uxia2NNMPUCQzjo6Gsnz8xr_9YKTeTqzOu-hgdsjfHHx0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <YfqTqAjEPalXzOK7@pevik>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YfqTqAjEPalXzOK7@pevik>
Precedence: bulk

Hi!
> > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test
> > instead of the default 5min.
> > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so...
> We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here
> it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put
> timeout 10 sec. Sending patch.

Actually I hope to change the default timeout once I finish my runtime
patchset to something more reasonable as majority of LTP tests finish
under one second.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz