Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp2209290pxb; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 01:33:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzjrW556maA3K6DmholOyRn8gpRnk/PMNlvnMaicH/SMQsQq5Yu9vpObVWJgb82frrWqF8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d1e:: with SMTP id gs30mr28248307ejc.14.1643880837904; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 01:33:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1643880837; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dRnWuzkFZfiMr72PxiyuXaxZW9QFRahMYS99yM1Uu9wD0tlEYUH4rLBs92fs50nd/A C+eaxHiHZjrysFsfnxK6a7KlxRY80DhdA6lufU0JF5DVUZJE0eiKiLIdvWHLOn0Ls/Ma bK1wGnUJEA82H3CgPPbDjNbDC1xIV5i8wrfWS8ZBtJzVQYbsSozxbzHdnVOq68MXRUOh 3HXA4ar6XbAsPYvMgYAEP7Go8EXMKAlrluDLYL6h9onL0nCa5DBNoDiEqkxzWfdWzogN q5Da1RVmyMSjrkx8caB2Kz2ZAZ9S90ftTSYMdIDFT67TdT9VGh8EvAEsaYLQSvsH0YmK jqSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=9jF8Bs3HTOn12sXQ/zQWRv1Mody7bEDmU4n3TIWFpgg=; b=HiKc0TFeeuvCPnG6knAElUZyznopn78JrFssot6NuV87Wj8ZiH6P0Pi+krxUYJCqOO vAkQ+86MC2wN3MN+dIxajR43AwXk+QrODkDc/ujX8dMwLOczGquCISJJNfZQMeODi/+o 3/GSwql5EQ8OXx4U3AdgTPOOPNMDNAIlwqhpvwaxhwIzYdVvjCW23rlMajDGSO39/QEW QQWtAsVGDrasujRiaU3iWF8Bi6D1Em3taR9BLkJ8Ju+uM0UNdTPRb+yG1hVhey62US4x 2AJr8vsBbN0fs+/oZe1rgEtYX+q2u7b1DnsqtNf19Ut59x1xdf4hnz5+EE1+WkN4KL/1 kwtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=15vQrP2K; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hq31si13033119ejc.423.2022.02.03.01.33.21; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 01:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=15vQrP2K; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231706AbiBBQ5S (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:57:18 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:58988 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346056AbiBBQ5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:57:18 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3B21110; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:57:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643821037; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9jF8Bs3HTOn12sXQ/zQWRv1Mody7bEDmU4n3TIWFpgg=; b=15vQrP2KvZgO28J6TBmx5D7dCGO4NLdfJfDp4JJRxP+xfdUgIcydE9SaVebPeq0++Jkcfd pyEswqInWtk6KZLwUo3LCFZwdZVh4HOm2nknQ4GjQXIKuvLVnaY+KMRzS+z1Ukh6en3tmG lscUPEmF5mYEmuMZHwKl4zjVBG7acZ4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643821037; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9jF8Bs3HTOn12sXQ/zQWRv1Mody7bEDmU4n3TIWFpgg=; b=BUpDgri3PyC6tkBmbSfWor5cwePlT0Q0oyR+n04gX8NEwICiWv4nbtKXhxQgpCfAqHybAQ 1AMJM6R/TVfN+fCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02A013E99; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id TN+KNOy3+mG6QQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:57:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:15 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: Amir Goldstein , kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara , Ext4 , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , LTP List Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org > Hi! > > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > > > instead of the default 5min. > > > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here > > it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put > > timeout 10 sec. Sending patch. > Actually I hope to change the default timeout once I finish my runtime > patchset to something more reasonable as majority of LTP tests finish > under one second. +1. We can then revert that temporary fix for fanotify22. Kind regards, Petr