Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp5399363pxb; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 00:47:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5gQy7N9+cbQJ/OaIH2oRfUk0jIH1g0NVcmrnVRrpg6vqB042o+82/FM50vHCyr+Q2ZGiZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:507:: with SMTP id r7mr1629269pjz.78.1644223636623; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:47:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644223636; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z4rFj3Zyz2LfEsRf0BX5hDMbJ2AAcvHmztqLDTb2qJf3/U3IeViuxF0JkucckgDvu/ jVKB/zDdK1SR4IURzg3q1118ZPTb1niiRpv4kqdgWv1KMQDTiHv01NmbPgDW4ODugt/v Rvrghres2NcIj6rnN0XdRD7dxBk83zTZofyJi+HEgAwW+mXXp55jFTx2d19gguK2vIgB s1a/+qS6qEjDLrrrnfUaeoE4UdDW1J9K5AAhHVwMvJNmKoRVb2kVTG0UvN4mQsQWKkRI rvi+vNs5S52csfZtIXGwYOe8TN7TXW16eM5lrkQma5810RFtyQV4ytk2BFTDPwMV25MY qXZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=aI4vEeTNOg9v1dM63azd4oTJbPVlwfR5PDX//Ogqchk=; b=KAOsyPn5tgztvwDnDUaAW9A0xF2njEFHdScc4FoRjm+mXrBAURStWYC1f69vGetRyP b7DQUGEF7HXI97lxYASGDOBGGlf5esJGxG/+OiJLAFo1IiIIK1xWXeiDjlGFbdPiDc6s o2q4iNNfHJWbnlUSx/g5IJlHOJRXd1h6djXlbVjj22UDfBCaIhGxg9uHNn3yoJk8YhQ4 onGSYBZ9M1MOhKTVv0qNkr8eoPBg+qMTUYnwjg+J556qdiJqeuNmeaalAa45C/CBT7YX By0zGuU9gCZji8hU0rrjV7AWV5hWFZXOaWIvA9aZEpWoL3d/jGLfCoifCKcWR5yjWeYt y69g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=sjNLgI1s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 68si8598315pfw.137.2022.02.07.00.46.56; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:47:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=sjNLgI1s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380101AbiBEOKy (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 09:10:54 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40396 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1380104AbiBEOKu (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 09:10:50 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 215B7WVB006898; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:39 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=aI4vEeTNOg9v1dM63azd4oTJbPVlwfR5PDX//Ogqchk=; b=sjNLgI1sUZRL2LMhP0mDmbOClbwzc2bgenieP8AtOVbHaFl0P9tTwx8SJbBiyV1/3Kvs qk5gMAactf4I/tbCWntdPUVKMymIpEtYvaDRndzQzWhGyKglF3LKffMJ3Cgm8LVoFWB4 YieOUnbmfBf6FW/a3KWDSYlNaHGsqEcgWnjJlLr/bitaE/VbEwR6T5Chh6vs/Z3B4YCI Er9476RiAxMk7hNUcvB3tIlhlxn35yzCU1ylCgejWD4Clw/nuT8I222fde3WsE+ulaRm y8tynY5Orcl+RUmm4h5V3tfmZXzLmso3VpGWjb4mWC+Ujmh3phIgcCbpMS7S63V0E1Yn GQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e1hvby3q6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 05 Feb 2022 14:10:39 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 215EAdvV023132; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:39 GMT Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e1hvby3pt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 05 Feb 2022 14:10:38 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 215E2rtr026680; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:36 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e1gv8t0tu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 05 Feb 2022 14:10:36 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 215EAY3M32244050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:34 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2A1A4055; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6DA4040; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.12.205]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:10:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Jan Kara , Harshad Shirwadkar , Ritesh Harjani Subject: [PATCHv1 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 19:39:55 +0530 Message-Id: <40b6efa3a8333ec411d05fe5390f0977f7576d64.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: pZZh8IPiGJt26LKF67pM7wq_67aL9OQO X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6R7XRIpKBxBlTnT09cmA6EYi4Pb-ST6Z X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-05_10,2022-02-03_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=718 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202050095 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org We don't need the return value of mb_test_and_clear_bits() in ext4_mb_mark_bb() So simply use mb_clear_bits() instead. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index f80af108d05e..23313963bb56 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block, if (state) mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); else - mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); + mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) && (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) { gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT); -- 2.31.1