Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:42:41 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of
 ext4_inode_block_valid()
Message-ID: <20220207164241.voulrwcz4ib2ujoz@quack3.lan>
References: <cover.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
 <1c5fae30be49b5116e4e5604e6224b33b778feaf.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1c5fae30be49b5116e4e5604e6224b33b778feaf.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat 05-02-22 19:39:56, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> This API will be needed at places where we don't have an inode
> for e.g. while freeing blocks in ext4_group_add_blocks()
> 
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

...

> @@ -329,7 +324,8 @@ int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
>  		else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
>  			n = n->rb_right;
>  		else {
> -			ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
> +			if (inode)
> +				ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
>  			break;

In case inode is not passed, we must not overlap any entry in the rbtree.
So we should return 0, not 1.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR