Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
        Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 6/9] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:32:48 +0530
Message-Id: <a971935306dafb124da0193c7dad1aa485210b62.1644992610.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1644992609.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1644992609.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

We don't need the return value of mb_test_and_clear_bits() in ext4_mb_mark_bb()
So simply use mb_clear_bits() instead.

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index c2a6f924b456..bb3cfcd545ce 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 		if (state)
 			mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
 		else
-			mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
+			mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
 		if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
 		    (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) {
 			gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
-- 
2.31.1