Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To:     fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] tests/ext4: Ensure resizes with sparse_super2 are handled correctly
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:20:51 +0530
Message-Id: <cover.1645549521.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

As detailed in the patch [1], kernel currently does not support resizes
with sparse_super2 enabled.  Before the above patch, if we used the
EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS ioctl directly, wiht sparse_super2 enabled, the
kernel used to still try the resize and ultimatley leave the fs in an
inconsistent state. This also led to corruption and kernel BUGs.

This patchset adds a test for ext4 to ensure that the kernel handles
resizes with sparse_super2 correctly, and returns -EOPNOTSUPP. 

Summary:

  Patch 1: Fix the src/ext4_resize.c script to return accurate error
           codes.
  Patch 2: Add the ext4 test for checking resize functionality

Changes since v1 [2]

  *  In patch 2, don't iterate if the expected errno is returned
  *  Code cleanup and additional comments for clarity (also see extra
     note in patch 2)
  *  No changes in patch 1

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b1489186cc8391e0c1e342f9fbc3eedf6b944c61
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/cover.1644217569.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com/ 

Ojaswin Mujoo (2):
  src/ext4_resize.c: Refactor code and ensure accurate errno is returned
  ext4: Test to ensure resize with sparse_super2 is handled correctly

 src/ext4_resize.c  |  46 +++++++++++++------
 tests/ext4/056     | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/ext4/056.out |   2 +
 3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 tests/ext4/056
 create mode 100644 tests/ext4/056.out

-- 
2.27.0