Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp6448641iob; Tue, 10 May 2022 19:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqr1TvZReHTXZOmZNYSHI7hCkl6knVCNdEUzNPUSu7rS/biQsApfS5CJxzQyZuq8blC+rx X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ccc1:b0:15a:24df:a7cc with SMTP id z1-20020a170902ccc100b0015a24dfa7ccmr23428020ple.42.1652237621198; Tue, 10 May 2022 19:53:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652237621; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ws5SAclm/h3JfoJJU38bToLaWe39mdLTY66M0qJCSM/upF4uOjpC+HhtndhUn+TC4i 4bLBtE01XhAjd8J21H2zDzptok8ol8GxVvPnu126PK5YuVZUkaYv3j0afwpnlKbckrvV J7AzKXU4TylsS70ougVtft13DPmeLBEzCTLLSjYxt98bqUtxwEYZspIMuVcn0Wv9Qezn GUjV0uJ4t6tsB/7nSvQbuQuAYVOJb+6hWMBHfRt6FzPYEYc9CE1wgxqKqQwU1X9gOJ76 b3YDV7wPuI4a4Z04XMBJw7kWM8V92ONr4cKv8x8nSWPrz/DHV5RtJDlDyAccKZGliqAW UTUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Cp70BUpCCE4RFwC+nEreumrpoMpQlU4/sdMRucnYpP0=; b=ykqYodm9jbXnRSWJ6eyPtwhzMBncLzRm6BpBd6H89TXg7EtvItFWQk+EhEPYgf6gG6 HWsetZgjB2O7Bdh4WK0Fk6zNHILw3xuFrHUgFp3tgas6X5PsQ/H5UC8kQRAZiYBSP2Gd kT55EoPynRTuZtRbJksZLa73J5Pg8JZIhueb9tDVpRQ3IPMIhfQM0fmD/j5JoKBffx+1 9oVJ19XfztE1ga9afjmr9s2IZxSz7QoVAJ/OvDt7RsI2WVDR4uh4B6gHYbV9pbNlFGqf OUpAbJyNf257PMZsWWxT9bt3thGNSIQHabCHnga1SNhITKdN46ApCzeNpDPIqsKfX6Jp hRow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Sv0ubqWb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k21-20020a63ff15000000b003ab1f09b883si1251728pgi.545.2022.05.10.19.53.21; Tue, 10 May 2022 19:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Sv0ubqWb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236247AbiEJXXc (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 May 2022 19:23:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44650 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233372AbiEJXX2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 19:23:28 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F42A2802F5; Tue, 10 May 2022 16:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F27B8201C; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F481C385CE; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:23:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652225003; bh=e59r18xSxhijBVYd8jpKjsz2cx3igw6HBJgjPaVJtDY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Sv0ubqWbpdeqLbwbUaUTEs6+W/fnUGWHrFuHBYr82WMm9aR4ymhqifd0jvcmpBNb0 LoS+NHYvGR2oXcO+EyUYfftGyD4gvMCNThE4IO0UgIEFihoFphP8kpd8IFl1mCdkuV pr9JuYpOJdljpQn0eU+yVswhajqRkAVdHvq+5ZmnW1cBcVNFiq0UH0WPDttPtQtrPH ZPt6sF1xd68swqRfy53yRl2OwrzTzV9o2h20dSy4rScODkm04zjr+Iej3Hh5y8sPPi eZTh8rWM7WxXXEB2wNEZAprzcwVyArX3NRLNSYmFh3tV5BVUA1cxnndvq1Vkn4L+8J U8ep19b3ySU9Q== Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:23:21 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Layton , Lukas Czerner , Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups Message-ID: References: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 05/09, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:08:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > This series cleans up and fixes the way that ext4 and f2fs handle the > > test_dummy_encryption mount option: > > > > - Patches 1-2 make test_dummy_encryption consistently require that the > > 'encrypt' feature flag already be enabled and that > > CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION be enabled. Note, this will cause xfstest > > ext4/053 to start failing; my xfstests patch "ext4/053: update the > > test_dummy_encryption tests" will fix that. > > > > - Patches 3-7 replace the fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() helper > > function with new functions that work properly with the new mount API, > > by splitting up the parsing, checking, and applying steps. These fix > > bugs that were introduced when ext4 started using the new mount API. > > > > We can either take all these patches through the fscrypt tree, or we can > > take them in multiple cycles as follows: > > > > 1. patch 1 via ext4, patch 2 via f2fs, patch 3-4 via fscrypt > > 2. patch 5 via ext4, patch 6 via f2fs > > 3. patch 7 via fscrypt > > > > Ted and Jaegeuk, let me know what you prefer. > > > > Changed v1 => v2: > > - Added patches 2-7 > > - Also reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > > > Eric Biggers (7): > > ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported > > f2fs: reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_policy_to_key_spec() > > fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption > > ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API > > f2fs: use the updated test_dummy_encryption helper functions > > fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() > > Since I haven't heard from anyone, I've gone ahead and applied patches 3-4 to > fscrypt#master for 5.19, so that the filesystem-specific patches can be taken in > 5.20. But patches 1-2 could still be applied now. Hi Eric, Let me apply #2 in the f2fs tree first. You can put "Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim " in #6. Thanks, > > Any feedback on this series would be greatly appreciated! > > - Eric