Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp306703iob; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:04:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXXy02x7um9o7pwrDzx89YADzkMCMrdllSWl1HZ1G0pXTQHJ3TOCJX3IemdCYbe/zo9h+1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d01:b0:6f4:d873:d7a0 with SMTP id gn1-20020a1709070d0100b006f4d873d7a0mr3311549ejc.717.1652432686235; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:04:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652432686; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sz52Qwe01FSZ4ynt01zYEvVFgcyKGEhgQzf22J6rjkPMTfNdzvQ33xPhwU7BuR9LJr C2iWW3rsIJ0YESq/mdnozXAwhCXrYV0tdh2ntulzPKP33q3QmokO6vSSKnIzQ9pwF0es YMtzXwBKVyt+ermp4nn9SUL//LDKuO9M9er1vPGDzQQ0cXpu2HcE6ojdSg8xTZV8QSzA +C6iLDoaAW6/mYah0QlWXc/If0Ws/iNLCwIVr+xNY1Hyaxqbzg1jRf6/sYXsGp3ZkFXC 1dQowT1oOu6x5pEhP9o2/68InfS1o+0rrFJQ53NtlZQE77oouOGCFciUBgzcdha2PE0r mZqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=sixMYQ0R7mrXqEOvBn/r3CaRGGSsWzEq5FUp5X2sNm4=; b=Mb6GdioCXUduasry3T0TmksV8GiJVmBWVa0CdKUe28o5ixO43PuAZ82X9ykRqJgX37 /9oJv2ILgPV1gnSsCoPjxUCfbkfYtbYIOA7e3LfFI0yGnlqemJPqJEmgcoOkEMOQSM2l 1p7yEpxlAkt2Hc3wylJBGsJ7w0bnxJPwksHlaDmUJah21eOUyadSe6NVWb94Usaw+3gO 29lLd/CHOsIUfnev0LJtIEkZ1/q7Q+tVg+1FVahLXFrOUZng/bShmfQEeAzAjf+8ceUM O8ACtsiZb/Ik4opbbUDU4tIk83b1qKIXBvytxbvcRSNAPjSexgp742Va3x3BpUZM3KV/ 98kQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mit.edu header.s=outgoing header.b=B7B3bqMp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mit.edu Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp10-20020a170906c14a00b006e8038543c4si1563750ejc.887.2022.05.13.02.04.09; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mit.edu header.s=outgoing header.b=B7B3bqMp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mit.edu Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344728AbiEKQ2D (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 May 2022 12:28:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48538 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234814AbiEKQ2C (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2022 12:28:02 -0400 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D95D666A2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 09:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-108-7-220-252.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.7.220.252]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 24BGRjSm006409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 May 2022 12:27:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1652286466; bh=sixMYQ0R7mrXqEOvBn/r3CaRGGSsWzEq5FUp5X2sNm4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=B7B3bqMphTrX7sLmIsCzb6lGQI/PHn+iOOr2jAHrAmj2mxjN/nLk2Tv1Yt/sj9Mce 60TqwQ3B3bqG0DUVfR9uYrlbPl14457emVL1vXUPWJgDIkkmvG1XeQ6WISn5JRvVh6 TX7NHkA84Ks630ABnB3wVLue4+QqX9ZdYNYBv2smRwKp6VK5FCwKOLV4EL2s0wAHst 24JKV4kbpHEvG87tXy5DG9wa16qbt03dHPPeVBdGScdZq9W94uhCmyQXR348vy/IwH cCRkS198lmG6jQ2XKLrhYB7W0u3OK5jJJh+wXA/9L28cfAppn8nCTUOAStqKMtWxxK lOVTz91U0pcyg== Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 00ABD15C3F0C; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:27:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:27:44 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Wang Jianjian Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Should ext4_bio_end_io be ext4_end_io_end ? Message-ID: References: <20220406125251.2135346-1-wangjianjian3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220406125251.2135346-1-wangjianjian3@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:52:51PM +0800, Wang Jianjian wrote: > There is no ext4_bio_end_io, should it be ext4_end_io_end ? I believe the correction in the comment should be "cannot be called from ext4_end_bio()". - Ted