Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:34:11 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To:     Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
        adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, lczerner@redhat.com,
        enwlinux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@huawei.com, yebin10@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] ext4: correct max_inline_xattr_value_size
 computing
Message-ID: <20220616040411.5vsnxz5fc4yq4zri@riteshh-domain>
References: <20220616021358.2504451-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
 <20220616021358.2504451-4-libaokun1@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220616021358.2504451-4-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 22/06/16 10:13AM, Baokun Li wrote:
> If the ext4 inode does not have xattr space, 0 is returned in the
> get_max_inline_xattr_value_size function. Otherwise, the function returns
> a negative value when the inode does not contain EXT4_STATE_XATTR.

Yes, this looks good to me.

Feel free to add -
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/inline.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index cff52ff6549d..da5de43623dd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ static int get_max_inline_xattr_value_size(struct inode *inode,
>  	struct ext4_inode *raw_inode;
>  	int free, min_offs;
>
> +	if (!EXT4_INODE_HAS_XATTR_SPACE(inode))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	min_offs = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size -
>  			EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE -
>  			EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize -
> --
> 2.31.1
>