Received: by 2002:a05:6358:45e:b0:b5:b6eb:e1f9 with SMTP id 30csp1093817rwe; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6zHgNnRRv/7CrKP27qETzro8SW7wgBLqfRUFixPWolYVfpcNTrRHFkfIAYomH3PVUqiqX9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:44c:b0:445:f2f1:4add with SMTP id p12-20020a056402044c00b00445f2f14addmr9353203edw.257.1661583752884; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:02:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1661583752; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=E00fMSwFDfF/EkJaT9NXI61cFJOxR5Ajxv4LnQP0Pa3PxIWQQQotRX87T/cTlkUgLH uc2otIfyXBRHNLwjGObuk9z6Ciyj2Qhi8QN5gvYFGRcdxRvWuBa11oWDPAyKHpxIK0Ls wgKxOYHhWZR2uJKt+Nu3CXVYRVUK/SKcm0Mt1a+L59MjucfSoGBsMom/DrLBET1D3d/L 5nSjT15d/qLOu5uoEgNcoGi2wu/jfEdwgM0O4bP1WHsaNXpB70p92IZOtu8NNPZ938T6 5MWHtxr33oMLC+lWqZ87cNL2dxATeecHSIUZHA0dJadLGTEGYVenjuSBiIp+N7uKLT8c YwpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=aUUkol97LIieLuW9B5d1ZsS0F0W1SLQ6iCEZLOhG0XE=; b=vaiJRwkSLXFeaqv4yKI50TZbJkKiIiKK4kEJhMs3oBSeFXFEa37ivqPF8xXUEo0Ax3 ydMZfoMbw64i/Lj/r00NHkBCNgtcPTMe++pr9ivEt9Xd92OAROughN/W5H5+hYFbThCx yqJiH1rV3D87r+09n/JsWHGiOK/OXOhKWMqavdm9A0Er8ndZJLSO/HliEnqiEsqPyqDo RBMzS3hEva6/HKyEuCaJ4LKkknEVKKOUqyFB5YE7aS4KbVKRt4hKyFNgGvtzYNYNUtUD Pp25KNjdnp2jX4gUFGzmLXbbwXUld7FdJtFV+ZkMfaTXkWj2PRUOp6lmPEQpmj3GTcYd 9Sjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=OL4a6u9Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nc21-20020a1709071c1500b00734c8b99826si3049046ejc.803.2022.08.27.00.02.08; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=OL4a6u9Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232634AbiH0HBk (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 27 Aug 2022 03:01:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232279AbiH0HBf (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Aug 2022 03:01:35 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA898FD51; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9C5B82744; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47D5AC433D7; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:01:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661583691; bh=t71ES1YnK8ZvdIpsL6806kD5NdIj707sDDhTCEMW1ls=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OL4a6u9QZmOvZNwraAGup/WYFCcH9t8v3R3qde4moQuG7Ra6M84Obxo2y10N1WUg4 spfmdccgz7qfwC6RAiX+wIJeI8TRRzYo3xRAyg5KFm0gpZQhUd9j8XtM/Js1/RgTGw upcAl6TrrCocIqjlVLaeCmniTwVNTS2VezCkUz+hONpwSV/pX+pYdY9pdPP8Iuwupn ZEbpUp05i/yRZ6ZDmPfkfJVe4yVFnLnCUW4I85pJndXkvuTNeARV+l1zu50uz/hs1r J1nB/m/LTB7wP9wLPCeaZG977No8/z/txa6cj4WqTOKQegxyhh3Wqtm0vmeTwTP0FC UIlli3Cho5yTA== From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH v5 3/8] fscrypt: change fscrypt_dio_supported() to prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 23:58:46 -0700 Message-Id: <20220827065851.135710-4-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2 In-Reply-To: <20220827065851.135710-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20220827065851.135710-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Biggers To prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN support, make two changes to fscrypt_dio_supported(). First, remove the filesystem-block-alignment check and make the filesystems handle it instead. It previously made sense to have it in fs/crypto/; however, to support STATX_DIOALIGN the alignment restriction would have to be returned to filesystems. It ends up being simpler if filesystems handle this part themselves, especially for f2fs which only allows fs-block-aligned DIO in the first place. Second, make fscrypt_dio_supported() work on inodes whose encryption key hasn't been set up yet, by making it set up the key if needed. This is required for statx(), since statx() doesn't require a file descriptor. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- fs/ext4/file.c | 9 ++++++-- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +- include/linux/fscrypt.h | 7 ++---- 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c index 90f3e68f166e39..8d4bee5bccbf42 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c +++ b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c @@ -401,46 +401,45 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh); /** - * fscrypt_dio_supported() - check whether a DIO (direct I/O) request is - * supported as far as encryption is concerned - * @iocb: the file and position the I/O is targeting - * @iter: the I/O data segment(s) + * fscrypt_dio_supported() - check whether DIO (direct I/O) is supported on an + * inode, as far as encryption is concerned + * @inode: the inode in question * * Return: %true if there are no encryption constraints that prevent DIO from * being supported; %false if DIO is unsupported. (Note that in the * %true case, the filesystem might have other, non-encryption-related - * constraints that prevent DIO from actually being supported.) + * constraints that prevent DIO from actually being supported. Also, on + * encrypted files the filesystem is still responsible for only allowing + * DIO when requests are filesystem-block-aligned.) */ -bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) +bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct inode *inode) { - const struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); - const unsigned int blocksize = i_blocksize(inode); + int err; /* If the file is unencrypted, no veto from us. */ if (!fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode)) return true; - /* We only support DIO with inline crypto, not fs-layer crypto. */ - if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode)) - return false; - /* - * Since the granularity of encryption is filesystem blocks, the file - * position and total I/O length must be aligned to the filesystem block - * size -- not just to the block device's logical block size as is - * traditionally the case for DIO on many filesystems. + * We only support DIO with inline crypto, not fs-layer crypto. * - * We require that the user-provided memory buffers be filesystem block - * aligned too. It is simpler to have a single alignment value required - * for all properties of the I/O, as is normally the case for DIO. - * Also, allowing less aligned buffers would imply that data units could - * cross bvecs, which would greatly complicate the I/O stack, which - * assumes that bios can be split at any bvec boundary. + * To determine whether the inode is using inline crypto, we have to set + * up the key if it wasn't already done. This is because in the current + * design of fscrypt, the decision of whether to use inline crypto or + * not isn't made until the inode's encryption key is being set up. In + * the DIO read/write case, the key will always be set up already, since + * the file will be open. But in the case of statx(), the key might not + * be set up yet, as the file might not have been opened yet. */ - if (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_alignment(iter), blocksize)) + err = fscrypt_require_key(inode); + if (err) { + /* + * Key unavailable or couldn't be set up. This edge case isn't + * worth worrying about; just report that DIO is unsupported. + */ return false; - - return true; + } + return fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_dio_supported); diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c index 109d07629f81fb..26d7426208970d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/file.c +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c @@ -40,8 +40,13 @@ static bool ext4_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); - if (!fscrypt_dio_supported(iocb, iter)) - return false; + if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)) { + if (!fscrypt_dio_supported(inode)) + return false; + if (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_alignment(iter), + i_blocksize(inode))) + return false; + } if (fsverity_active(inode)) return false; if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 3c7cdb70fe2efc..0759da1919f4ad 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -4498,7 +4498,7 @@ static inline bool f2fs_force_buffered_io(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); int rw = iov_iter_rw(iter); - if (!fscrypt_dio_supported(iocb, iter)) + if (!fscrypt_dio_supported(inode)) return true; if (fsverity_active(inode)) return true; diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h index 7d2f1e0f23b1fe..13598859d5b394 100644 --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode, bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, const struct buffer_head *next_bh); -bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter); +bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct inode *inode); u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks); @@ -801,11 +801,8 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, return true; } -static inline bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, - struct iov_iter *iter) +static inline bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct inode *inode) { - const struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); - return !fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode); } -- 2.37.2